Top 10 RUN Powered by ADP Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about OnPay

• OnPay stands out for its intuitive design, making it easy for supervisors, managers, and payroll specialists to navigate and execute payroll tasks efficiently
• It supports both hourly and salaried employees, allowing companies to manage diverse workforce needs under one system.
• By automating key payroll functions, OnPay helps organizations cut down on the time and expenses typically involved in payroll operations.

Where OnPay falls short

• While great for SMBs, larger companies might find customization options less robust for complex payroll needs.
• OnPay focuses on payroll and may require additional tools for functions like recruitment or performance management.
• As a cloud-based solution, internet connectivity is required, which might be a constraint in certain environments.

What reviewers like about Heartland Payroll

• The self-service portal is intuitive and easy to navigate, offering features for payroll entry, custom reporting, and data access.
• Dedicated payroll specialists are knowledgeable, friendly, and responsive, resolving issues efficiently.
• Payroll automation eliminates the need for manual calculations by handling taxes, deductions, and filings at local, state, and federal levels.

Where Heartland Payroll falls short

• Onboarding processes can be disorganized and manual, leading to errors and requiring additional oversight.
• Frequent turnover of payroll representatives affects continuity and consistency for some customers.
• Employees often face challenges accessing the portal, with issues like account lockouts or subpar mobile experience.

What reviewers like about QuickBooks Payroll

• Automates tax filing, paycheck generation, and sends real-time notifications to reduce manual effort.
• Interface includes step-by-step tutorials and works for both beginners and experienced users.
• Integrates with QuickBooks for financial reporting and analytics.

Where QuickBooks Payroll falls short

• Steeper pricing compared to alternative payroll systems, especially for smaller businesses or limited payroll needs.
• Complexity in resolving reporting errors or adjusting liabilities, often requiring external support or advanced accounting knowledge.
• Occasional glitches, lag, and freezes, especially with the online version, impacting usability and efficiency.

What reviewers like about APS Payroll

• Integration with Sage Intacct simplifies operations and reduces manual work.
• Extremely user-friendly, with clear features for both admins and employees.
• Excellent customer service with responsive, knowledgeable, and dedicated support teams.

Where APS Payroll falls short

• Implementation can be disorganized with some inconsistencies and delays in setup or onboarding.
• Customization is limited in certain features like deduction fields, reporting, and benefits management.
• Reporting features can be challenging for new users until they gain familiarity with the system.

What reviewers like about SurePayroll

• Payroll setup is quick, easy to use, and simplifies previously cumbersome tasks like tax deductions and filings.
• Easy-to-use platform with a simple interface, making it accessible for non-technical users.
• Exceptional customer support with dedicated representatives offering hands-on assistance and problem resolution.

Where SurePayroll falls short

• Occasional issues with missing payments or discrepancies that require follow-up.
• While customer service is generally positive, isolated instances of less satisfactory support were mentioned.
• Limited flexibility for advanced users or features when compared to some competitors.

What reviewers like about Paylocity Web Pay

• Scales with business growth, allowing for extensive record-keeping.
• Reduces manual errors and simplifies compliance.
• Integrated tracking helps automate payroll calculations.

Where Paylocity Web Pay falls short

• New users may require time to navigate all features efficiently.

What reviewers like about Microkeeper

• Consolidates payroll, rosters, timesheets, and HR tasks into one platform.
• Does not require extensive training to get started.
• Automates payroll processing and other repetitive administrative tasks, saving time.

Where Microkeeper falls short

• Occasional app or feature downtime causes minor disruptions.
• Superannuation or payslip summary updates sometimes lack clarity or employee-facing visibility.
• App design and layout are considered less modern by some users.

What reviewers like about CheckMark Payroll

• Offers multiple check printing formats so businesses can customize how employee paychecks are printed.
• The ability to print paychecks, reports, and federal tax forms directly from your own printer gives businesses full control over payroll operations without relying on third parties.
• Reduces the administrative burden of payroll processing, making it suited for small to mid-sized businesses.

Where CheckMark Payroll falls short

• The product focuses primarily on check printing and payroll processing, and may not include broader HR functionalities like onboarding, time tracking, or benefits administration.
• Some functions, such as data entry or record updates, may require manual intervention, which can be time-consuming and prone to user error.
• The product description suggests a desktop-based system, which may lack modern cloud features like remote access, automatic updates, or mobile support.

What reviewers like about Fingercheck

• Centralizes payroll, time tracking, and attendance in a single platform, making processes more efficient and error-free.
• Easy-to-use interface and mobile app allow employees and administrators to navigate and complete tasks with ease.
• Reporting features generate valuable insights on payroll, labor movement, and cost management.

Where Fingercheck falls short

• User interface for complex features can be challenging for some without customer support guidance.
• Occasional system slowdowns and delays when generating reports or loading locations.
• Limited flexibility in building customizable reports and specific features like benefit administration.

What reviewers like about EPAY HCM

• Exceptional customer support, available 24/7, ensuring quick and effective troubleshooting.
• User-friendly interface with simple navigation, both on the mobile app and website.
• Efficient time tracking features allowing easy access, editing, and management of employee attendance and payroll.

Where EPAY HCM falls short

• Occasional complexity with certain features, like adding mass PTO with different hour allocations for part-time vs. full-time employees, creating additional work.
• Fingerprint mismatches causing errors in payroll, especially with certain employees, despite re-registering fingerprints.
• Issues with login reliability, such as cases where users struggle to access accounts due to password or keyboard settings.