Top 10 Howspace Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about Nozbe Teams

• Clean interface works for both personal and professional tasks without requiring extensive training.
• Task management and project collaboration tools work for individuals and teams of all sizes.
• Syncs across devices and platforms so updates are reflected quickly everywhere.

Where Nozbe Teams falls short

• No long-term free version; trial periods are short, limiting extended evaluation.
• Priced higher than some competitors, which may be a barrier for cost-conscious teams.
• Marketplace integrations and additional functionality are limited, restricting customization.

What reviewers like about Kahootz

• Interactive and engaging platform for team building activities, icebreakers, and increasing collaboration among team members.
• Offers a variety of features like live gaming options, customization of questions and points, and easy content creation.
• Secure cloud service with strong data protection measures, appealing to users concerned about cybersecurity.

Where Kahootz falls short

• Occasional technical issues like lags and difficulties in launching live games, which can disrupt the user experience.
• Limited ability to customize backgrounds, access to company images, and basic color scheme options, hindering personalization features.
• Learning curve for beginners, lack of online tutorials for setup, and occasional complexity in certain functionalities without proper guidance.

What reviewers like about Weavy

• Offers a wide range of collaboration features like chat, video calls, and document collaboration, simplifying integration into applications.
• Provides developer-friendly APIs and SDKs for popular platforms, making it easy to implement features.
• Excellent customer support with quick responses and helpful guidance.

Where Weavy falls short

• Some users find the documentation lacking in detail for certain features, requiring extra support.
• Limited customization options for UI and integrations, affecting flexibility for advanced customization.

What reviewers like about Stackby

• API links for real-time data updates and automation, saving time and reducing manual work.
• Diverse range of features combining databases, spreadsheets, task management, and forms for comprehensive business solutions.
• Excellent customer service with personalized assistance, including setup meetings and responsive support.

Where Stackby falls short

• Steep learning curve for beginners, especially those unfamiliar with spreadsheet applications like Airtable or Google Sheets.
• Limited availability of integrations, although more are anticipated in future updates.
• Occasional bugs and functional issues requiring timely support intervention.

What reviewers like about JANDI

• Multimedia resource management
• Web-based collaboration
• Easy information sharing

Where JANDI falls short

• Limited offline access
• Can be cumbersome for small teams
• Not focused on real-time collaboration

What reviewers like about Cisco Webex Teams

• Interface is clear and performs well on mobile devices.
• Covers video conferencing, instant messaging, and screen sharing in one product.
• Meeting invites are easy to access and scheduling is straightforward.

Where Cisco Webex Teams falls short

• Audio quality and bandwidth consumption are higher than expected for some users.
• Occasional lag in the Android app; lower-end devices may not be well-supported.
• Federation setup and hybrid/on-premises configuration can be complex for large organizations.

What reviewers like about Google Workspace

• G Suite offers good value for money and has been reliable for long-time users.
• The product is considered good overall and valuable for productivity.

Where Google Workspace falls short

• Customer support is extremely poor, with non-existent human assistance and incompetent chatbot interactions.
• Issues with billing and unauthorized charges, difficulties in cancellation process, and lack of proper communication channels for problem resolution.

What reviewers like about Teams.cc by 500apps

• Encrypted file sharing
• In-app video conferencing
• Channel management

Where Teams.cc by 500apps falls short

• Limited features compared to competitors
• May lack advanced integrations
• Not user-friendly for beginners

What reviewers like about MURAL

• Facilitates visual collaboration and ideation among distributed teams effectively.
• Offers a variety of templates and tools for creative problem-solving and planning.
• Enhances team alignment and productivity during brainstorming and planning phases.

Where MURAL falls short

• May have a learning curve for new users and require time to acclimate to all features.
• Limited ability to integrate with other collaboration tools.
• Clogged performance with excessive content, affecting board functionality sometimes.

What reviewers like about Picter

• Real-time file editing
• Centralized project reference
• Comment sharing

Where Picter falls short

• Limited integrations
• May require training
• Not suitable for large teams