Top 10 Done Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about Microsoft SharePoint

• Rich graphics capabilities
• Customizable presentations
• Organizational focus

Where Microsoft SharePoint falls short

• Complex for new users
• Requires Microsoft ecosystem
• Limited free version features

What reviewers like about Friyay

• Client feedback integration
• Real-time project collaboration
• Multi-language support

Where Friyay falls short

• Limited to design-related projects
• May not suit non-creative teams
• Requires internet access

What reviewers like about Airtable

• Provides unmatched flexibility for various tasks, making project management simple and tailored to specific needs.
• User-friendly interface that is surprising for a digital tool, offering easy customization and different views for enhanced usability.
• Easy organization, collaboration, and customization of databases to streamline workflows.

Where Airtable falls short

• Initial setup can be daunting, requiring some support to create customized databases tailored to specific needs.
• Interface may not always be simple and can be overwhelming for newcomers, particularly during setup and template customization.
• While flexible, might not be adequate for complex data modeling in specialized sectors compared to more refined platforms.

What reviewers like about Nozbe Teams

• Clean interface works for both personal and professional tasks without requiring extensive training.
• Task management and project collaboration tools work for individuals and teams of all sizes.
• Syncs across devices and platforms so updates are reflected quickly everywhere.

Where Nozbe Teams falls short

• No long-term free version; trial periods are short, limiting extended evaluation.
• Priced higher than some competitors, which may be a barrier for cost-conscious teams.
• Marketplace integrations and additional functionality are limited, restricting customization.

What reviewers like about Kahootz

• Interactive and engaging platform for team building activities, icebreakers, and increasing collaboration among team members.
• Offers a variety of features like live gaming options, customization of questions and points, and easy content creation.
• Secure cloud service with strong data protection measures, appealing to users concerned about cybersecurity.

Where Kahootz falls short

• Occasional technical issues like lags and difficulties in launching live games, which can disrupt the user experience.
• Limited ability to customize backgrounds, access to company images, and basic color scheme options, hindering personalization features.
• Learning curve for beginners, lack of online tutorials for setup, and occasional complexity in certain functionalities without proper guidance.

What reviewers like about JANDI

• Multimedia resource management
• Web-based collaboration
• Easy information sharing

Where JANDI falls short

• Limited offline access
• Can be cumbersome for small teams
• Not focused on real-time collaboration

What reviewers like about DEON

• Accelerates idea-to-launch
• Captures true workflow
• Insightful progress tracking

Where DEON falls short

• May require setup time
• Limited integrations
• Not suitable for small teams

What reviewers like about Google Workspace

• G Suite offers good value for money and has been reliable for long-time users.
• The product is considered good overall and valuable for productivity.

Where Google Workspace falls short

• Customer support is extremely poor, with non-existent human assistance and incompetent chatbot interactions.
• Issues with billing and unauthorized charges, difficulties in cancellation process, and lack of proper communication channels for problem resolution.

What reviewers like about Samesurf

• Real-time collaboration
• Multi-platform support
• Integrated messaging

Where Samesurf falls short

• Limited advanced features
• Can be resource-intensive
• Learning curve for new users

What reviewers like about Zeplin

• Provides easy collaboration between designers and developers, streamlining the hand-off process.
• Generates CSS codes for elements, aiding in the development process.
• Enables quick translations of design colors, assets, and constraints into code.

Where Zeplin falls short

• Limited advanced functionalities like prototyping and responsiveness features.
• Some delays may occur in certain operations, possibly due to internet speed.
• Lack of certain features like direct export of images, responsive design options, and animations.