Top 10 Thryv Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about Daylite

• CRM tailored for small businesses with deep macOS and iOS integration.
• Integrates with Apple Mail, Contacts, and Calendar, keeping workflows and correspondence in sync.
• Customizable workflows, pipelines, and data organization without needing technical skills.

Where Daylite falls short

• Deep feature set creates an initial learning curve for new users.
• Some users feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of features and customization options.
• Automation options, while helpful, are considered limited and "click-intensive" by power users needing more streamlined workflows.

What reviewers like about Agile CRM

• Exceptional and responsive customer support, praised for being quick, knowledgeable, and friendly.
• Live chat feature is highly effective, providing real-time and efficient problem resolution.
• Support agents go above and beyond, often offering detailed explanations and personalized assistance.

Where Agile CRM falls short

• Some specific functionality limitations, particularly regarding event reporting and sales team management.
• Adjustment to the user interface can take time, especially for those accustomed to other platforms.
• Some users reported uncertainty in the resolution's effectiveness immediately after receiving advice.

What reviewers like about UPilot

• Offers a 360-degree view of contacts, deals, and history, which makes data management intuitive and insightful.
• Highly customizable fields, deal stages, and workflows tailored for B2B sales, SMBs, and solo entrepreneurs.
• Effective email synchronization with a 2-way sync that eliminates the need for switching between applications.

Where UPilot falls short

• Bulk editing and advanced reporting features are limited, requiring time-consuming manual adjustments.
• Can feel overwhelming or confusing to beginners due to the extensive options and customization capabilities.
• Advanced features like adding multiple contacts in meetings or activities are absent, leading to inefficiencies.

What reviewers like about Commence CRM

• Customizable to specific business processes without requiring costly IT or third-party services.
• Non-technical users and new employees can adopt it quickly.
• Works online and offline with synchronization that ensures uninterrupted data access.

Where Commence CRM falls short

• Desktop interface is visually outdated.
• Database sync is slow and glitchy for larger systems.
• Limited external database connectivity requires manual workarounds for large-scale data updates.

What reviewers like about ForceManager

• Organizes client data and automates tasks to reduce administrative work in sales management.
• Works across platforms including mobile apps with minimal training required.
• GPS tracking, meeting organization, and check-in tools improve time management.

Where ForceManager falls short

• Closed system approach requires support team intervention for changes like user rights adjustments.
• Integration with Mailchimp and Google Calendar is limited, which can disrupt cross-tool workflows.
• Time zone setup and desktop icon design are unclear or inconsistent for some users.

What reviewers like about InfoFlo CRM

• Interface is accessible for non-technical users and small businesses.
• Modular design lets businesses add or remove features to match their specific workflows.
• One-time purchase model eliminates recurring subscription fees.

Where InfoFlo CRM falls short

• Limited mobile app reduces usability on smartphones and tablets.
• High system resource consumption may require hardware upgrades for optimal performance.
• Buggy updates and occasional technical glitches make some releases unreliable.

What reviewers like about IRIS CRM

• Knowledgeable support staff resolve issues quickly.
• Easy to navigate, even for new users.
• Includes lead management, ticketing, residuals reporting, and VoIP integration for ISOs and sales teams.

Where IRIS CRM falls short

• Some users find the system's layout (especially in earlier versions) cramped, with information packed too closely together.
• Steep learning curve for new users due to the abundance of features and functionalities.
• Occasional hiccups in custom field integrations or onboarding processes reported by a few users.