Top 10 MSB Docs Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about FilesDNA

• Mobile app is user-friendly and convenient for everyday tasks like signing and sharing documents.
• Features make transitioning to digital easy and efficient, especially with e-Signature security and document management.
• Highly recommended for maintaining work efficiency, especially during challenging times like the pandemic.

Where FilesDNA falls short

• Some users find certain advanced features like pre-defined templates lacking when compared to other solutions like Google Docs.
• Limited features available in the marketplace for further customization and enhancement of functionalities.

What reviewers like about Sertifi

• Provides a secure way to receive credit card information, enhancing trust and security for both users and clients.
• Streamlines the process of document signing and payment collection, saving time and increasing efficiency.
• User-friendly platform that is easy to use for all parties involved, reducing the need for manual paperwork and transitions.

Where Sertifi falls short

• Some users find the process of creating administrators and managing features not as intuitive, requiring additional support.
• Limited customization options for editing documents on mobile devices, potentially hindering user experience.
• Occasional issues with multiple emails being sent during the signing process, leading to potential confusion and email overload.

What reviewers like about Legalesign

• Efficient and responsive customer support that bridges knowledge gaps and provides confidence in implementation.
• User-friendly platform with quick document processing, saving time and resources.
• Easy to use with clear features, suitable for both users and signers.

Where Legalesign falls short

• The software may appear overwhelming for newcomers due to the richness of features without proper guidance.
• Limited selection in the Marketplace for advanced functionalities and additional apps/connectors.

What reviewers like about Signaturely

• Streamlines digital signature creation and implementation, reducing manual work significantly.
• User-friendly interface with easy navigation, suitable for both work and personal use.
• Continuous addition of new features and enhancements for improved functionality.

Where Signaturely falls short

• May pose a challenge for newcomers due to the complexity of advanced features without proper support.
• Limited selection of additional apps and connectors in the Marketplace could restrict access to advanced functionalities.

What reviewers like about RightSignature

• Makes it easy to send documents for signature without the need to print or scan, promoting a paperless environment.
• Integrates well with existing systems like Clio and BambooHR, enhancing efficiency in document handling.
• Offers a clear user interface and simple setup, making it accessible even for non-tech users.

Where RightSignature falls short

• User interface can be clunky and challenging for signers, especially on mobile devices, impacting ease of use.
• Limited integration with other sign-in services like Google or LinkedIn, potentially limiting flexibility for some users.
• Some users experience delays in tech support responses, which can hinder issue resolution and support effectiveness.

What reviewers like about Foxit eSign

• Easy setup and interface that is user-friendly, enabling quick adoption and use.
• Integration with other platforms like WordPress, offering flexibility for diverse users.
• Excellent customer service with prompt and helpful responses, enhancing user experience.

Where Foxit eSign falls short

• Limited visibility of advanced features and functionalities in the marketplace for additional apps and connectors.
• Initial complexity and intimidation for new users without sufficient guidance or support during onboarding.

What reviewers like about CocoSign

• Streamlines eSignature workflows, making contract signing faster and more efficient.
• User-friendly interface, suitable for both professionals and non-professionals.
• No credit card requirement for sign up.

Where CocoSign falls short

• Inconsistent customer support and unresponsive to user issues.
• Some complaints about difficulties accessing account and lack of support for technical issues.

What reviewers like about Signority

• Collects electronic signatures via email, saving time on paper-based processes.
• Both businesses and clients can navigate the platform without training.
• Supports reusable templates for frequently sent documents.

Where Signority falls short

• Limited review of additional features may deter some users from exploring advanced functionalities.
• Lack of comprehensive marketplace options for apps and connectors might restrict customization for specific use cases.

What reviewers like about SignRequest

• Easy to use, clear interface that simplifies the signing process for users, including those unfamiliar with digital signatures.
• Quick and efficient workflow, saving time and streamlining document signing for both senders and signers.
• Cost-effective solution compared to competitors, providing value for the price paid.

Where SignRequest falls short

• Limited customization options and advanced features may not meet the needs of users looking for more complex functionalities.
• Pricing might be perceived as too expensive by some users, potentially restricting adoption among certain segments.
• Dependency on the availability of additional apps and connectors in the marketplace for extended capabilities, which may limit advanced functionalities.