Compare Splunk APM vs AQA Synthetic Monitoring

By being built on OpenTelemetry, Splunk APM offers flexibility in data management. It allows for seamless instrumentation and the option for selective indexing, helping organizations control costs while maintaining effective monitoring.

With AlwaysOn profiling, Splunk APM continuously monitors resource consumption, allowing IT teams to identify inefficiencies and optimize the allocation of resources, ensuring smooth application performance even under high load.

Splunk APM excels at providing detailed service mapping and trace analysis. This helps teams visualize application dependencies and track performance metrics across different services, facilitating faster identification of bottlenecks or performance issues.

The solution offers comprehensive visibility across applications, infrastructure, front-end systems, and logs. By correlating data from all these sources, Splunk APM enables teams to troubleshoot issues efficiently and gain a complete understanding of the system’s performance.

With the ability to deploy on-premises or in the cloud, this solution offers flexibility for businesses of all sizes and environments, enabling scalable and adaptable monitoring.

AQA Synthetic Monitoring integrates effortlessly with popular tools like Dynatrace and Splunk, enhancing its capabilities and providing a unified view for teams already using these solutions.

The platform features an intuitive dashboard that simplifies monitoring, making it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to track performance and act on insights quickly.

By identifying potential issues early, the tool helps businesses prevent minor problems from escalating into major disruptions, ensuring optimal performance and service continuity.