CyberArk Conjur vs Keycloak Comparison
CyberArk Conjur
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
Conjur is identity and access management (IAM) software that unifies policy management, privileged session management and privileged activity monitoring for the most critical applications – and all cloud-based applicatio…
Keycloak
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Medium Business
- Small Business
Keycloak is a thin identity and access management layer (IAM) for modern applications. Keycloak is built to handle enterprise needs and offer a simple experience to developers, it protects identities with strong two-fact…
CyberArk Conjur leads on user satisfaction with a 4.5-star rating across 2 reviews.
SpotSaaS Analysis
CyberArk ConjurKeycloak
The core difference between CyberArk Conjur and Keycloak lies in their target markets, with Keycloak being tailored for medium to large enterprises requiring strong security and developer flexibility, while CyberArk Conjur lacks specified details on its target audience. Ideal buyers for Keycloak include IT administrators and developers in industries like SaaS and Fintech, while the ideal buyer for CyberArk Conjur remains undefined.
- Target market details not specified - Pricing information not available - Best suited for undefined company sizes - Lacks specific use case scenarios - No defined user roles or personas - Focus on security and access management
- Open-source identity and access management solution - Ideal for companies with 50 to 5,000 employees - Best for SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce, and Consulting - Suitable for IT administrators, software developers, and security engineers - Offers robust multi-factor authentication features - Supports fine-grained access control for enhanced security
CyberArk Conjur vs Keycloak — at a glance
| Feature | CyberArk Conjur | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Reviews | 2 | 80 |
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Free version | No | No |
| Best for | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business | Medium Business, Small Business |
| Category | Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software | Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software |
| Platforms | SaaS/Web/Cloud | SaaS/Web/Cloud |
| API | — | Available |
| Support modes | Online | Online |
| Certifications | SOC 2 | GDPR |
| Data residency | Global | Global |
Key differences between CyberArk Conjur and Keycloak
- Target audience: CyberArk Conjur is built for Large Enterprises and Medium Business, while Keycloak targets Medium Business and Small Business.
- User satisfaction: CyberArk Conjur scores higher with a 4.5-star average.
- Deployment: CyberArk Conjur supports SaaS/Web/Cloud; Keycloak supports SaaS/Web/Cloud.
CyberArk Conjur vs Keycloak — find the better fit before you commit.
Which tool fits your team best
Which is actually cheaper for your team size
Where each product wins, per real buyers
Most Identity and Access Management (IAM) Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.
Biggest differences
Features
Pricing
Buying details
Security
Buyer feedback
Integrations
Product tour
Other options
Talk to an expert Talk to an expert |
Biggest differences
Start here before you go deeper into features.
Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business
Open-source IAM ideal for enterprises needing strong security and developer flexibility.
- You need robust multi-factor authentication and fine-grained access control.
- Your team includes developers and IT admins comfortable with medium-complexity setup.
- You want a flexible, configurable IAM solution tailored for modern applications.
- Your organization requires turnkey solutions with comprehensive commercial support and SLAs.
- You are a very small business with minimal identity management needs.
CyberArk Conjur typically suits Large Enterprises and Medium Business. Keycloak tends to fit Medium Business and Small Business better. The right choice depends on your team size, workflow, and whether a free trial matters.
Description | Conjur is identity and access management (IAM) software that unifies policy management, privileged session management and privileged activity monitoring for the most critical applications – ... Read More about CyberArk Conjur | Keycloak is a thin identity and access management layer (IAM) for modern applications. Keycloak is built to handle enterprise needs and offer a simple experience to developers, it protects ... Read More about Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
Free Trial Availability |
|
|
Spotsaas ScoreWhat's this? ↗ | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 |
User RatingsBased on verified Spotsaas reviews | ||
Best Company Size | — | 50 to 500 employees501 to 5,000 employees |
Get pricing help | Get pricing help |
Where each option fits best
See where each product is strongest, which teams it fits, and what causes buyers to keep looking — before you commit.
Based on buyer reviews and verified product data collected by Spotsaas.
Key strengths
No key benefits available yet.
- Streamlined Identity Management: Keycloak simplifies user authentication and authorization processes, enabling your team to focus on core business objectives without the hassle of managing complex identity systems.
- Single Sign-On (SSO) Convenience: With Keycloak's SSO capabilities, your users enjoy seamless access across multiple applications with just one set of credentials. This not only enhances user satisfaction but also reduces password fatigue.
- Robust Security Features: Built with security in mind, Keycloak offers features like multi-factor authentication and fine-grained access control, helping you protect sensitive data and comply with industry standards.
Best fit
No best-fit guidance available yet.
- 50 to 5,000 employees
- SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce, and Consulting
- IT Administrators, Software Developers, Security Engineers, and DevOps Professionals
Reasons buyers look elsewhere
No alternatives guidance available yet.
- Users may seek alternatives to Keycloak due to its complexity in setup and configuration, particularly for smaller teams or projects that require a more straightforward identity management solution.
- Some organizations might prefer alternatives that offer better integration with specific cloud services or platforms, especially if they are heavily invested in a particular ecosystem.
- Performance concerns could lead users to explore other options, particularly if they experience scalability issues or latency with Keycloak in high-demand environments.
Need a second opinion?
Get shortlist help from a software advisor
Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.
How do CyberArk Conjur and Keycloak Compare on Features?
Total Features | 5 Features | 9 Features |
|---|---|---|
Unique Features | No unique features | No unique features |
Get Quote | Get Quote |
Compare CyberArk Conjur and Keycloak on pricing
Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.
Pricing Option | ||
|---|---|---|
Pricing Plans |
|
|
Other Details
Organization Types supported |
|
|
|---|---|---|
Platforms Supported |
|
|
Modes of support |
|
|
API Support |
|
|
Get help choosing | Get help choosing |
Security & Compliance
Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.
SOC 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
|---|---|---|
HIPAA | ✗ No | — |
GDPR | — | ✓ Yes |
Single Sign-On (SSO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Encryption | — | ✓ Yes |
Audit Logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Residency | 🌐 Global | 🌐 Global |
CyberArk Conjur User Reviews & Rating Comparison
User Ratings | ||
|---|---|---|
Rating Distribution | ||
Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI | Buyer sentiment Buyer sentiment is very strong across 2 reviews, with consistently positive feedback. What buyers like
Common complaints
| Buyer sentiment Users generally appreciate Keycloak's strong security features and flexible identity management, though some find setup and support challenging. What buyers like
Common complaints
|
Pros and Cons |
|
|
Positive Reviews | No reviews available for the product | No reviews available for the product |
Media and Screenshots
Screenshots | No screenshots available. |  6 Screenshots |
|---|
Top Alternatives to CyberArk Conjur and Keycloak in 2026
Alternatives |
|---|
Add another option to compare side by side
Search by product name to compare pricing, fit, and buyer feedback in one view.Compare similar software options
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, CyberArk Conjur or Keycloak?
- CyberArk Conjur edges out the other on user ratings (4.5 vs 4.3). That said, the best pick depends on your use case — use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
- Do CyberArk Conjur and Keycloak offer a free trial?
- Neither CyberArk Conjur nor Keycloak currently lists a free trial.
- What is the starting price of CyberArk Conjur vs Keycloak?
- CyberArk Conjur starts at Contact for pricing. Keycloak starts at Contact for pricing.
- What are the top alternatives to CyberArk Conjur?
- Top alternatives to CyberArk Conjur include Alloy, Visual Guard, Oracle Identity Management, SailPoint IdentityNow, AWS IAM.
- What are the top alternatives to Keycloak?
- Top alternatives to Keycloak include Okta, Oracle Identity Management, Cognito, SailPoint IdentityIQ, AWS IAM.