Top 10 Zoom Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about GotoMeeting

• Covers online meetings, desktop sharing, and video conferencing in one platform.
• Audio and video quality is clear and reliable.
• Tools are easy to administer for both virtual meetings and video conferencing.

Where GotoMeeting falls short

• High network bandwidth consumption limits use outside corporate environments.
• Installation can be time-consuming, affecting initial performance.
• Connectivity issues, dropped calls, and audio/video quality problems occur during some meetings.

What reviewers like about FreeConferenceCall.com

• FreeConferenceCall.com is user-friendly, with a clear interface accessible for both new and non-technical users.
• It offers high-quality audio and video conferencing capabilities, screen sharing, file sharing, and recording features.
• The platform allows for easy setup, providing access to multiple regions for global conferencing.

Where FreeConferenceCall.com falls short

• Some users may find the platform's richness of features and customizations complex, especially without adequate support for newcomers.
• The Marketplace may have limited options for additional apps and connectors, restricting access to advanced functionalities for certain users.

What reviewers like about Lifesize

• High-quality video and audio for clear, effective communication.
• Interface lets users join meetings from any device without technical issues.
• Stable video conferencing with clear audio and sharp video resolution.

Where Lifesize falls short

• Issues with screen sharing, causing disruptions or kicking users out of the meeting occasionally.
• Limited participant capacity in certain plans, which may be restrictive for larger teams or organizations.
• Connectivity issues experienced with slow internet connections, affecting the quality of screen sharing and overall performance.

What reviewers like about Pexip

• Simple deployment and compatibility across various platforms, making it easy to join conferences.
• Quality video and audio performance, enhancing the overall meeting experience.
• Reliable and responsive customer service for assistance when needed.

Where Pexip falls short

• Lack of advanced features like remote PC control which some competitors offer.
• Limited customization options for conversation views or backgrounds compared to other platforms.
• Some users experienced unstable connections or call drops during usage.

What reviewers like about Google Meet

• Easy to use platform with a seamless interface for video conferencing.
• Built-in integration with Google services like Gmail calendar for convenient scheduling.
• Allows sharing screens, conducting video/audio calls, and sharing media for effective communication.

Where Google Meet falls short

• Limited number of participants allowed in video calls can be a drawback for larger meetings.
• Lack of advanced features like whiteboard and survey options compared to some competitors.
• Some users experience occasional network glitches affecting call quality.

What reviewers like about Whereby

• Easy to use without the need for software installations, making it accessible and convenient for all users.
• Offers reliable video calling experience with reliable audio and video quality, enhancing communication.
• Integrates with popular platforms like Miro, YouTube, and Google Drive, providing versatile collaboration options.

Where Whereby falls short

• Some users have reported occasional connection issues affecting the quality of the meetings.
• Limited features in the free plan, such as restrictions on the number of participants and lack of recording capabilities, may hinder comprehensive usage for some users.
• Lack of advanced functionalities like screen sharing reliability and API support for creating and deleting business plan rooms, which could enhance user experience for specific needs.

What reviewers like about ezTalks

• Screen sharing and video conferencing are easy to set up, supporting virtual collaboration.
• Combines SMS, voice calls, and fax into one communication platform.
• Interface is accessible for users at all technical levels.

Where ezTalks falls short

• Occasional technical issues and connectivity problems reported, requiring a stable internet connection for optimal performance.
• Free version has limited features that may not meet broader user needs.
• Some users find the initial loading process slow, affecting quick access to meetings.

What reviewers like about Samba Live

• Provides high-quality and lag-free video conferencing with end-to-end encryption, suitable for training programs.
• Offers practical solutions for integrating video conferencing into websites like WordPress, enhancing user experience.
• Supports all devices with features like screen sharing, whiteboard, document sharing, and secure data transmission.

Where Samba Live falls short

• Might be complex for newcomers without proper support due to the richness of features and customizations.
• Limited selection in the Marketplace for additional apps and connectors might restrict advanced functionalities.

What reviewers like about Vectera

• Reliable online meetings with good video quality.
• Customizable platform for branding with easy scheduling and branded video meetings.
• User-friendly interface with features like whiteboard and document sharing.

Where Vectera falls short

• Limited participants allowed in meetings depending on the plan.
• Lack of mobile app for joining meetings on the go.
• Occasional connectivity issues like lag in audio and video.