Top 10 Tellent Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about FlowCV

• Very easy and intuitive to use, producing professional, polished resumes.
• Wide variety of templates with extensive customization, layout and formatting options.
• Smooth editing and download experience that lets users pick up where they left off.

Where FlowCV falls short

• Lacks a monthly pricing plan, offering mainly an annual option.
• Occasional minor bugs, though usually with workarounds.

What reviewers like about Auzmor Hire

• Strong candidate management
• Collaborative feedback system
• Easy onboarding process

Where Auzmor Hire falls short

• Limited advanced features
• May not suit large enterprises
• Basic reporting capabilities

What reviewers like about Lever

• Automates and streamlines repetitive recruitment tasks like scheduling, email management, and interview feedback, saving time and improving efficiency.
• User-friendly interface with minimal training needed, enabling quick adoption across teams, including non-technical users.
• Improves collaboration and transparency within hiring teams and stakeholders by centralizing information and processes.

Where Lever falls short

• Customer support post-implementation is inconsistent and unresponsive at times, leading to delays in issue resolution.
• Limited customization options for workflows, scorecards, and career pages, which may not meet the needs of larger organizations or advanced use cases.
• Duplicate calendar invites and lack of advanced integration with tools like Microsoft Teams, Outlook, or Zoom (especially on lower-tier plans) frustrate some users.

What reviewers like about Enhancv

• Creates modern and impactful resumes that catch recruiters' attention and help land jobs.
• User-friendly interface with easy navigation and predefined templates for quick resume generation.
• AI assistance offers accurate suggestions and enhances the editing workflow.

Where Enhancv falls short

• Limited file format options for downloading resumes may restrict customization.
• Issues with formatting and importing content from Word documents, leading to time-consuming editing.
• Premium plan may not significantly enhance suggestions compared to the free version, potentially leading to user dissatisfaction.

What reviewers like about CleverStaff

• Time-saving features
• Efficient candidate search
• Cost-effective solution

Where CleverStaff falls short

• Limited customization options
• May not integrate with all platforms
• Basic analytics features

What reviewers like about BrightMove

• Flexible pricing suited for small and medium-sized businesses.
• Customizable and accessible — adapts to specific needs without requiring technical expertise.
• Support is available via email, chat, and phone and is responsive and professional.

Where BrightMove falls short

• Auto-texting to candidates, automated job alerts, and reporting options are limited.
• Some interfaces are cluttered or hard to navigate.
• Email support is available but chat support is not always accessible, slowing issue resolution.

What reviewers like about JazzHR

• Automates and streamlines hiring, offering features like workflows, resume keyword searches, and automated communications, which significantly save time and improve efficiency.
• User-friendly interface with easy navigation and setup, even for non-technical users.
• Highly customizable workflows, integrations with tools like Google Calendar, LinkedIn, Salesforce, and various job boards, and ability to tailor the system to unique recruitment processes.

Where JazzHR falls short

• No dedicated mobile app, limiting on-the-go access and requiring reliance on a browser.
• Initial setup and learning curve for new users can be overwhelming, especially without training or reference to documentation.
• Reporting features are often limited, particularly at basic package levels, and not well-suited for large enterprise-level needs.

What reviewers like about Greenhouse

• Interface requires minimal training for recruiters and hiring teams.
• Customizable workflows, scorecards, and templates support structured, consistent hiring.
• Integrates with LinkedIn Recruiter, Calendly, DocuSign, and Workday.

Where Greenhouse falls short

• Reporting features are often cited as weak, lacking flexibility and requiring third-party tools or extensive configuration to meet advanced needs.
• Permissions and user role settings can be complex, clunky, or difficult to manage effectively in some cases.
• Integration with specific tools like Microsoft Teams and automated email workflows is limited or not fully optimized.

What reviewers like about Talismatic

• Job market intelligence
• Competitor analysis
• AI-driven insights

Where Talismatic falls short

• Limited data sources
• May require training
• Pricing may be high for small teams