Together Mentorship Review: Is It The Right Mentoring Software For Your Team?

Together Mentorship works best for organizations with straightforward mentoring workflows that don't require Outlook calendar integration. If your team relies on Outlook for scheduling, you'll need to manually sync sessions or use a workaround—confirm this in a demo before committing.

The platform excels at session tracking, goal documentation, and structured mentor-mentee pairing, but scheduling conflicts have been reported when managing multiple mentors across time zones. Before shortlisting, verify that the platform's activity logging and session templates match your mentorship model.

Some users found the reminder system effective for engagement, while others needed to supplement it with their own notification workflows. Check whether the platform's networking features integrate with your existing communication tools (Slack, Teams, email) or if mentors and mentees will need to switch contexts to access guidance and resources.

Pricing typically scales with the number of active mentor-mentee pairs. Clarify whether you're charged per user, per pair, or per organization, and whether inactive accounts still count toward your tier.

Ask about data export options if you need to migrate mentorship records or analyze program outcomes in your own systems. The lack of Outlook integration and occasional scheduling friction are the main limitations to test.

If your team uses Google Calendar or manual scheduling, these constraints are minimal. If Outlook is central to your workflow, this platform may create friction that outweighs its structured mentorship benefits.