Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS Comparison
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security)
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Small Business
Introducing Cisco Secure Email, formerly known as Email Security, the ultimate solution to safeguard your communication against the most common and harmful cyber threats. With a renewed three-tier approach including Prem…
Indusface WAS
Starting at $49 /Month
- Free Trial
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
Indusface WAS is a robust Web Application Scanning platform trusted by over 2000 companies to provide reliable risk detection and security services. The platform boasts features such as timely vulnerability detection and…
Indusface WAS leads on user satisfaction with a 4.6-star rating across 50 reviews.
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS — at a glance
| Feature | Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) | Indusface WAS |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Reviews | 21 | 50 |
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | $49 /Month |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Free version | No | No |
| Best for | Large Enterprises, Small Business, Medium Business | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business |
| Category | Website Security Software | Website Security Software |
| Platforms | Browser Based (Cloud) | SaaS/Web/Cloud |
| API | — | Available |
| Support modes | Business Hours, Online | Online |
| Certifications | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001 | GDPR |
| Data residency | US | US |
Key differences between Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) and Indusface WAS
- Pricing: Indusface WAS starts at $49 /Month. Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) pricing is not publicly listed.
- Free trial: Indusface WAS offers a free trial; Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) does not.
- User satisfaction: Indusface WAS scores higher with a 4.6-star average.
- Deployment: Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) supports Browser Based (Cloud); Indusface WAS supports SaaS/Web/Cloud.
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS — find the better fit before you commit.
Which tool fits your team best
Which is actually cheaper for your team size
Where each product wins, per real buyers
Most Website Security Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.
Biggest differences
Features
Pricing
Buying details
Security
Buyer feedback
Integrations
Product tour
Other options
Free PDF comparison
Download this Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS comparison
Get the full side-by-side as a PDF — these picks plus the top Website Security Software tools, with verified ratings, pricing and features.
- Side-by-side on pricing, features & ratings
- Plus the category top 10, scored & ranked
- Emailed to you — no on-screen download
No file downloads on screen — we email it to you. One-click unsubscribe anytime.
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS: Biggest differences
Start here before you go deeper into features.
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security)
Best for enterprise-grade email security with advanced threat protection.
- You need robust defense against malware, phishing, and business email compromise.
- Your organization requires integration with a broader Cisco security ecosystem.
- You want tailored security bundles to match varying enterprise security needs.
- You are a small team without dedicated IT security resources.
- You require transparent, low-cost, or easy-to-deploy email security solutions.
Best for enterprises needing accurate, automated web app vulnerability and malware scanning.
- You require zero false-positive vulnerability detection to improve security accuracy.
- You want a combined platform offering both automated scanning and manual pen-testing.
- Your organization needs real-time malware monitoring and blacklisting capabilities.
- You are a startup or very small business with limited security budget and resources.
- You need highly customizable or developer-centric scanning tools with simpler setup.
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security): Best for enterprise-grade email security with advanced threat protection. Indusface WAS: Best for enterprises needing accurate, automated web app vulnerability and malware scanning.
Description | Introducing Cisco Secure Email, formerly known as Email Security, the ultimate solution to safeguard your communication against the most common and harmful cyber threats. With a renewed ... Read More about Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) | Indusface WAS is a robust Web Application Scanning platform trusted by over 2000 companies to provide reliable risk detection and security services. The platform boasts features such as ... Read More about Indusface WAS |
|---|---|---|
Entry Level Pricing |
|
|
Free Trial Availability |
| |
User RatingsBased on verified Spotsaas reviews | ||
Best Company Size | 51-500 employees1000+ employees | 51-500 employees500+ employees |
Get pricing help | Get pricing help |
Software Demo
Demo |
|---|
Need a second opinion?
Get decision help from a software advisor
Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.

- Independent advice — matched to your business
- Understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors
- Free 15-min call with a software advisor.
Step 1 of 4
How big is your team?
We tailor recommendations to companies your size.
How do Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) and Indusface WAS Compare on Features?
Total Features | 5 Features | 6 Features |
|---|---|---|
Unique Features | No unique features | No unique features |
Get Quote | Get Quote |
Compare Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) and Indusface WAS on pricing
Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.
Pricing Option | ||
|---|---|---|
Starting From |
|
|
Pricing Plans |
|
|
Pricing Page | Pricing information not available | ![]() |
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS: Other Details
Organization Types supported |
|
|
|---|---|---|
Platforms Supported |
|
|
Modes of support |
|
|
API Support |
|
|
Get help choosing | Get help choosing |
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS Security & Compliance
Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.
SOC 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
|---|---|---|
HIPAA | ✓ Yes | — |
GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
ISO 27001 | ✓ Yes | — |
Single Sign-On (SSO) | ✓ Yes | — |
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA) | ✓ Yes | — |
Data Encryption | ✓ Yes | — |
Audit Logs | ✓ Yes | — |
Data Residency | 🇺🇸 US | 🇺🇸 US |
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) User Reviews & Rating Comparison
User Ratings | 4.2 (based on 21 reviews) | |
|---|---|---|
Rating Distribution | ||
Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI | Buyer sentiment Overall positive sentiment with users appreciating strong security features but noting pricing and complexity concerns. What buyers like
Common complaints
| Buyer sentiment Users generally praise Indusface WAS for its accuracy and comprehensive scanning features but note concerns about pricing transparency and setup complexity. What buyers like
Common complaints
|
Pros and Cons |
|
|
Positive Reviews | No reviews available for the product | No reviews available for the product |
Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) and Indusface WAS Customers
Customers | No Customers information available. | ![]() ICICI Bank ![]() HDFC Life ![]() Axis Bank |
|---|
Media and Screenshots
Videos | ![]() 2 Videos | ![]() 1 Videos |
|---|
Top Alternatives to Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) and Indusface WAS in 2026
Alternatives |
|---|
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) or Indusface WAS?
- Indusface WAS edges out the other on user ratings (4.6 vs 4.2). That said, the best pick depends on your use case, so use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
- Do Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) and Indusface WAS offer a free trial?
- Indusface WAS offers a free trial. Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) does not.
- What is the starting price of Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) vs Indusface WAS?
- Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) starts at Contact for pricing. Indusface WAS starts at $49 /Month.
- What are the top alternatives to Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security)?
- Top alternatives to Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security) include Avanan, IRONSCALES, Virusdie, Astra Security Suite, Webroot DNS Protection.
- What are the top alternatives to Indusface WAS?
- Top alternatives to Indusface WAS include Trust Guard, Intruder, IRONSCALES, Cisco Secure Email (formerly Email Security), INKY.
/logo_1710301476.789367.jpg)











