Webexpenses Reviews in June 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

great plattaform to work with

What do you like best? i like about webexpenses that is not complicated to use and they worry about their customers , they have a good customer support service What do you dislike? id like webexpenses to have a more friendly configuration on the admin side, sometimes is tedious checking if someone already exist in the company like going to pending users, users or archived, if you can put it in one tab and then we can filter it at will would be better What problems are you ...

Webexpenses has stremlined our processes

What do you like best? Our field employees are able to take pics of their receipts, add to their reports and send immediately. What do you dislike? We're still working out kinks on our cost codes but webexpenses has been very helpful. Recommendations to others considering the product: Use the test company to get the set-up exactly how you'd like users to see it. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Lost receipts, random cost ...

Amazing system & time saving solution

What do you like best? We previously used an old fashioned paper based expense system, so Webexpenses has been a much needed improvement in that department! As the expenses administrator, I find Webexpenses super easy and quick to navigate through - I am able to pull various reports i need, in just a few button clicks. I find the "notes" feature really useful especially when having to reject claims, a quick note can just be left instead of an awkward conversation! What do you ...

User Friendly & Efficient

What do you like best? As an admin account holder I find the platform very easy to navigate through. I also have a variety of reporting options available, allowing me to extract required pieces of information quickly, without having to sift through a lot of different data. I particularly like the 'Division Notice' feature, as it allows me to communicate any changes or updates to our entire team in one simple step. What do you dislike? There is very little to dislike about the ...

Hello 21st Century!

What do you like best? No more claims "lost in the post". Paperless. Emailed notification about expenses having been submitted for approval. What do you dislike? Having to re-enter the same information, it would be nice if you could copy the previous items' department/sector/customer/country details. Recommendations to others considering the product: It is the best, worst and only web based expenses system I have used. What problems are you solving with the product? What ...

Great solution

What do you like best? The fact that we are now paperless , and on the go claim submission and approval What do you dislike? nothing really , what's to dislike? It does exactly what it says on the tin Recommendations to others considering the product: If you wish to save time and money - try it What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Its efficient , it's paperless and everything is where you need it in seconds

So far so good...

What do you like best? The online portal is simple to use and so far always operational. The smaller features; such as automatic mileage calculations have really helped speed up the claim process for individuals. The ability to start and submit claims on the go has meant fewer delayed or missed expenses and has made users more aware of costs they incur. What do you dislike? Reporting is extensive but not always intuitive. Plus, the petty cash and credit care facilities are not as ...

Great System to Use

What do you like best? The system is user friendly and saves time What do you dislike? For what I have used the service for I don't really have anything that I dislike Recommendations to others considering the product: Webexpenses not only provides a great product but the support for customers is also very good. What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Being able to upload receipts gets rid of the problem of losing bits of ...