8.6
SpotScore

QuarkXpress Reviews in September 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons
Design seamlessly with QuarkXpress.
Add to compare
Starts from $474 / Year
QuarkXpress Reviews & Ratings
Are you using QuarkXpress?
Spotsaas Editor’s POV
QuarkXPress has garnered positive reviews over the past 12 months, with users highlighting its intuitive interface, precise control over elements, and seamless transition from layout to print preparation. Users appreciate its stability and reliable output for print publishing, making it a trustworthy tool. The software receives praise for its industry-standard ...Read more
QuarkXpress pros and cons
Gives precise control over text, images, and layout elements for detailed design work.
Consistent interface that users can learn and work in efficiently.
Adds new features regularly, including HTML5 custom interactivity for evolving design needs.
Used as a professional standard for typesetting and layout design in publishing.
Feature depth creates a learning curve that takes time and effort to overcome.
Compatibility issues with older file formats can interrupt workflows.
Filter results
Sort by :
Showing 221-230 out of 255
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
Quark express
What do you like best? Sometimes I worked with Korean language, Quark Express worked really well with foregin languages. What do you dislike? Most of graphic desigers use Photoshop or Illustrator, but Quark Express did work with the programs. What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Design layout
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
No longer the industry leader
What do you like best? Quark has always been easy to use. The design, organization and interface is very clean and well thought out making the overall use smooth and easy to learn. It was designed as page layout software and has always done that well. What do you dislike? I began using Quark when Pagemaker dropped the ball years ago. After Adobe began taking the lead I quickly realized that they had created software that was more versatile with smoother transitions into other programs for ...
Read more
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
Graphic designer
What do you like best? Easy short cut keys when you are working quickly to make a deadline. What do you dislike? That it's not interconnected to photoshop or lustrator like InDesign. What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? None
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
Quark for freelance graphic designers
What do you like best? Quark was the first best page layout program. Creating on screen is like laying out on a board but with massive editability. My current client has Quark files that need updating, so I will most likely be using Quark on their machine. Now that Adobe has moved to a subscription model, I may be considering Quark again as my go to layout program. What do you dislike? I was turned off by price. When InDesign debuted at a much cheaper price and had the ability to ...
Read more
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
A Very Handy Program
What do you like best? I like that this software can handle small and large publications from a one page advertisement to a newsletter or a book layout. It worked wonderfully for giant catalog layouts. It was streamline and easy to get to use. What do you dislike? It may not be as user friendly as some of the other competitive software that is out right now. If this software would add a few features that the competitors have now, they would be right up there with being my favorite. What ...
Read more
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
QuarkXPress Review
What do you like best? I really like the functionality of they short keys in quark and the way you can toggle a lot easier through the different tools than in adobe. Also, the ability to export pdfs separately is an important tool. What do you dislike? Probably the lack of integration with other adobe products. What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? How to get layout and design done faster and more efficiently. This is where the short ...
Read more
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
Who Still Uses Quark Xpress
What do you like best? It familiarity. it was the first page layout program that I used What do you dislike? It is antiquated on not fully integrated to into the Adobe Creative Suite programs. There is not an image editing program that goes along with it, What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? None that I can think of. It does not make sense to buy this as a stand alone program, especially when InDesign is part of the Adobe CC
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
Previous user
What do you like best? I used to use Quark professionally, but ever since switching to InDesign, I'll never use it again most likely. What do you dislike? Not as efficient as Adobe products, or as quick and organized Recommendations to others considering the product Switch to InDesign What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Not currently using
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
I love Quark and havebeenusing it since 1989.
What do you like best? Ease of use. As a designer, I find it is easy to create quick layouts. What do you dislike? I dislike that everyone is jumping on the InDesign bandwagon. Quark is a better program and with Q10 enhancements, it is even better. I find InDesign harder to work with. I just had one of my clients require that I use InDesign. So what I do is design in Quark then use Marzware to translate it into InDesign then send those files. Recommendations to others considering the ...
Read more
A
Anonymous
03/23/16
The original layout program
What do you like best? Quark has always been a very intuitive and was the program I learned starting out. It is simple enough for beginners. What do you dislike? It doesn't integrate with other programs the way it's competition does. What business problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized? Quark is a great program for layouts that require multiple pages.
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].