NEWJoin 2M+ software buyers|Get Weekly Insights, Trends & Expert PicksSubscribe free →

Spotsaas logo

8.8

SpotScore

Penpot logo

Penpot Reviews in July 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Open-source design and prototyping tool — self-hostable Figma alternative

4.4

Add to compare

Starts from Free / free

See Plans & Pricing

Penpot Reviews & Ratings

4.4

Very Good

Based on 310 ratings & 0 reviews

Are you using Penpot?

Rating Distribution

Excellent

(0)

Very Good

(0)

Good

(0)

Poor

(0)

Terrible

(0)

Spotsaas Editor’s POV

Penpot has built the most credible open-source alternative to Figma available today — the feature set is genuinely competitive for most design workflows, and the SVG-based open standards approach is architecturally superior to proprietary file formats. The free, unlimited-seat model is a genuine business model differentiator that makes it economically compelling ...Read more

Penpot pros and cons

  • Completely free with no per-seat pricing when self-hosted — a Figma-equivalent tool at zero software cost for unlimited team members.

  • Open-source (MPL 2.0) with full self-hosting means design data never leaves the company's infrastructure — critical for regulated industries.

  • SVG-based output using open web standards (CSS, HTML) produces design files that are directly readable by developers without proprietary format conversion.

  • Dev Mode with CSS inspection lets developers extract production-ready CSS values directly from design files without manual measurement.

  • Feature set lags behind Figma — advanced auto-layout, variables, and component library features are available but less mature than Figma's implementations.

  • Self-hosting requires Docker and server administration skills — small teams without DevOps support may find the setup overhead a barrier to adoption.

Filter results

Sort by :

Relevance
Relevance
Highest-Rated
Lowest-Rated
Least-Recent
Most-Recent

Share this page

Showing 0 - 0 out of 0

No Reviews Found!

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].