Top 10 Felt Alternatives 2026

What reviewers like about ArcGIS Online

• Combines mapping and analysis tools in a cloud-based environment.
• Provides access to workflow-specific apps, global maps, and diverse datasets.
• Includes mobile features for fieldwork productivity.

Where ArcGIS Online falls short

• Subscription costs may be high for smaller organizations.
• Geoprocessing functions are more limited than ArcGIS Desktop.
• Automation of certain functions could be improved.

What reviewers like about Maptitude

• Mapping tool with strong data analysis capabilities.
• User-friendly interface suitable for both beginners and experienced users.
• Excellent customer support with quick responses and helpful assistance.

Where Maptitude falls short

• Learning curve for complex features may require some training.
• Limited flexibility in graphics placement in layouts.
• Complexity may be challenging for first-time users without prior GIS experience.

What reviewers like about LocationsCloud

• Accurate location data
• Easy CSV exporting
• User-friendly interface

Where LocationsCloud falls short

• Limited to retail location data
• May not cover all regions
• Dependent on data sources

What reviewers like about 3-GIS

• Inexpensive solution
• Easy to use
• Data management capabilities

Where 3-GIS falls short

• Limited advanced features
• Not suitable for large datasets
• Basic functionality only

What reviewers like about OSPInSight

• Detailed mapping tools
• Integrates various data formats
• User-friendly interface

Where OSPInSight falls short

• May require training for full use
• Limited to PC platform
• Not suitable for mobile use

What reviewers like about Badger Maps

• Easy to use with mapping capabilities for efficient route planning.
• Excellent customer support available to assist users in maximizing the benefits of the app.
• Helps users stay organized by visualizing accounts, scheduling visits, and updating routes on the go.

Where Badger Maps falls short

• Some users find the richness of features and customizations overwhelming without sufficient guidance or training.
• Limited options in the Marketplace for additional apps and connectors might restrict advanced functionalities.

What reviewers like about eSpatial

• User-friendly interface and easy steps for creating daily travel routes.
• Outstanding customer support and training sessions provided for effective platform usage.
• Ease of merging multiple datasets and filtering data by different columns.

Where eSpatial falls short

• Lack of dark mode feature, which could enhance user experience.
• Integration with CRM may not always be smooth.
• Absence of certain data layers like USPS carrier routes.

What reviewers like about CARTO

• Feature-rich platform for spatial mapping, allowing multiple layers on each map for complex work demands.
• Provides cool designs for online maps with hassle-free installation and use.
• Stellar geographic information system, efficient for analytics and user tracking.

Where CARTO falls short

• Intimidating learning curve at the beginning for users without data analytics expertise.
• Limited layers and advanced features in some instances, such as user tooltips and styling label factors.
• Limited selection in the marketplace for apps and connectors, potentially limiting functionality.

What reviewers like about Mapbox

• Offers a wide range of customization options and base map styles for detailed, distinctive map designs.
• Integrates with mobile apps and delivers reliable performance with detailed map rendering.
• Free tier covers a generous usage limit, making it accessible for budget-constrained projects.

Where Mapbox falls short

• Map-view-based pricing can lead to unexpectedly high costs for popular sites or high-traffic apps.
• Out-of-the-box API tools are limited, requiring additional development effort for certain operations.
• Marketplace complexity can make it difficult for users to discover and use the full range of features.

What reviewers like about Maptive

• Powerful data management
• Supports large datasets
• User-friendly interface

Where Maptive falls short

• Can be expensive for small users
• Learning curve for advanced features
• Limited offline capabilities