CoderPad Reviews in September 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons
Unleash the full potential of your coding candidates.
Add to compare
Starts from $70 / month when yearly
CoderPad Reviews & Ratings
Are you using CoderPad?
Spotsaas Editor’s POV
CoderPad is a coding assessment tool for technical interviews. It integrates with major Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) including Greenhouse, Lever, and Workable. The interface is functional but has reported usability quirks—some recruiters note the code editor layout feels cramped on smaller screens, and the assessment creation workflow requires multiple clicks ...Read more
CoderPad pros and cons
Easy to use and simple interface, making it accessible for tech recruiters and interviewers.
Supports a wide range of programming languages, facilitating coding assessments in various domains.
Smooth experience for both interviewers and candidates, with features like code compilation, running tests, and code sharing.
Provides a question bank and the ability to create custom templates for interviews.
Lack of customization and advanced functionalities in the Marketplace may limit certain requirements.
Some users find the interface slightly awkward or chaotic, impacting overall user experience.
Filter results
Sort by :
Showing 51-60 out of 208
SK
Sarthak K
03/14/23
"Great tool!"
What do you like best about CoderPad? The ability to edit and code together. The availability of so many different programming languages
RD
Ruth D
03/13/23
"Easy to use - Amazing tool for remote technical interviews!"
What do you like best about CoderPad? It combines simplicity, flexibility and encourages collaboration to create a seamless experience for technical interviews. Some limitations with regards to internationalization but regardless, Ive been using this for a while now! It's wonderful!
RD
Ruth D
03/13/23
"Easy to use - Amazing tool for remote technical interviews!"
What do you like best about CoderPad? It combines simplicity, flexibility and encourages collaboration to create a seamless experience for technical interviews. Some limitations with regards to internationalization but regardless, Ive been using this for a while now! It's wonderful!
CL
Carlos L
03/11/23
"Great tool for coding interviews"
What do you like best about CoderPad? How easy it is to work collaboratively on simple development tasks that don't require complex envs. What do you dislike about CoderPad?
AC
Anaël C
03/11/23
"Coderpad is really nice!"
What do you like best about CoderPad? Having othe possibility to switch from a language to another very quickly. Having the replay
CD
Chuck D
03/09/23
"The right tool for the job"
What do you like best about CoderPad? CoderPad gives an IDE-like experience, with language awareness for several of the most common and popular languages. It allows me, as an interviewer, to allow a smoother experience for our candidates, so they can focus on what they know best!
MK
Maksym K
03/09/23
"Awesome tool for tech assessments"
What do you like best about CoderPad? Simple UI, huge library of questions and practical tasks, easy to customize, good report and skills customization. Report via email in pdf. Cool support team and managers!
JH
Joshua H
03/09/23
"Useful interviewing tool"
What do you like best about CoderPad? Supports multiple languages, interactive coding screens, ability to run tests to check work What do you dislike about CoderPad?
CD
Chuck D
03/09/23
"The right tool for the job"
What do you like best about CoderPad? CoderPad gives an IDE-like experience, with language awareness for several of the most common and popular languages. It allows me, as an interviewer, to allow a smoother experience for our candidates, so they can focus on what they know best!
JM
Joshua M
03/09/23
"Coderpad has been a great tool, but there's some extra functionality I've been wanting around tests"
What do you like best about CoderPad? The best part of CoderPad is the ability to view what the candidate is working on in real-time. The live-share capabilities are excellent.
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].