NEWJoin 2M+ software buyers|Get Weekly Insights, Trends & Expert PicksSubscribe free →

Spotsaas logo

9.2

SpotScore

Cline logo

Cline Reviews in July 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Open-source VS Code AI agent that writes code, runs commands, and uses the browser

4.6

Add to compare

Starts from Free / free

See Plans & Pricing

Cline Reviews & Ratings

4.6

Excellent

Based on 1850 ratings & 0 reviews

Are you using Cline?

Rating Distribution

Excellent

(0)

Very Good

(0)

Good

(0)

Poor

(0)

Terrible

(0)

Spotsaas Editor’s POV

Cline has achieved remarkable adoption (5M+ installs) by delivering genuine agentic capability directly inside VS Code — the editor most developers already use — without requiring a switch to a new IDE or workflow. The MCP support is a forward-looking differentiator: as the tool ecosystem grows, Cline becomes more capable without requiring updates to Cline ...Read more

Cline pros and cons

  • 5M+ VS Code installs and 1,850+ G2 reviews make Cline one of the most widely validated AI coding tools, reducing adoption risk.

  • True agentic capabilities inside VS Code — Cline can execute terminal commands, read URLs, and take browser actions without leaving the IDE.

  • MCP (Model Context Protocol) support extends Cline with custom tools, databases, and external services via a growing ecosystem of community plugins.

  • Checkpoint system lets developers snapshot the codebase state before an AI task and roll back instantly if the output is not satisfactory.

  • Agentic terminal execution requires careful task scoping — Cline can take unintended file system or network actions if tasks are described ambiguously.

  • BYOK model requires managing LLM API costs; high-usage development sessions can incur significant daily API spend without proper usage monitoring.

Filter results

Sort by :

Relevance
Relevance
Highest-Rated
Lowest-Rated
Least-Recent
Most-Recent

Share this page

Showing 0 - 0 out of 0

No Reviews Found!

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].