NEWJoin 2M+ software buyers|Get Weekly Insights, Trends & Expert PicksSubscribe free →

Spotsaas logo

ProcessMaker vs Inngest Comparison

Last updated:

ProcessMaker

3.4(15 reviews)

Starting at $1,495 /Month

  • Large Enterprises
  • Medium Business

ProcessMaker provides Business Process Management Software, working as a repository to organize, manage and run business processes. ProcessMaker is an open-source software, that is reliable and scalable, it guarantees us…

Inngest

4.8(175 reviews)

Starting at Free free

  • Small Business
  • Mid-Market

Inngest is a developer platform for building event-driven, durable, and scheduled background functions without managing queues or workers. Developers write ordinary functions in their existing codebase, annotate them wit…

Inngest leads on user satisfaction with a 4.8-star rating across 175 reviews.

ProcessMaker vs Inngest — at a glance

FeatureProcessMakerInngest
Rating3.4 / 54.8 / 5
Reviews15175
Starting price$1,495 /MonthFree free
Free trial No No
Free version No No
Best forLarge Enterprises, Medium Business, Small BusinessSmall Business, Mid-Market
CategoryBusiness Process Management SoftwareCloud Platform as a Service (PaaS) Software
PlatformsSaaS/Web/Cloud, Mobile - Android, Mobile - iOS, Installed - WindowsCloud
APIAvailableAvailable
Support modes24/7 (Live rep), Business HoursDiscord Community, Help Center, Email Support, Enterprise Support
CertificationsSOC 2
Data residencyGlobal

Key differences between ProcessMaker and Inngest

  • Pricing: ProcessMaker starts at $1,495 /Month, while Inngest starts at Free free.
  • Target audience: ProcessMaker is built for Large Enterprises and Medium Business, while Inngest targets Small Business and Mid-Market.
  • User satisfaction: Inngest scores higher with a 4.8-star average.
  • Deployment: ProcessMaker supports SaaS/Web/Cloud, Mobile - Android, Mobile - iOS, Installed - Windows; Inngest supports Cloud.

ProcessMaker vs Inngest — find the better fit before you commit.

01

Which tool fits your team best

02

Which is actually cheaper for your team size

03

Where each product wins, per real buyers

Most Business Process Management Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.

ProcessMaker - Business Process Management Software
Talk to an expert
Talk to an expert
Inngest logo
Talk to an expert
Talk to an expert

Free PDF comparison

Download this ProcessMaker vs Inngest comparison

Get the full side-by-side as a PDF — these picks plus the top Business Process Management Software tools, with verified ratings, pricing and features.

  • Side-by-side on pricing, features & ratings
  • Plus the category top 10, scored & ranked
  • Emailed to you — no on-screen download

No file downloads on screen — we email it to you. One-click unsubscribe anytime.

Biggest differences

Start here before you go deeper into features.

ProcessMaker

Best for

Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business

Inngest

Best for

Small Business, Mid-Market

ProcessMaker typically suits Large Enterprises and Medium Business. Inngest tends to fit Small Business and Mid-Market better. The right choice depends on your team size, workflow, and whether a free trial matters.

Description

ProcessMaker provides Business Process Management Software, working as a repository to organize, manage and run business processes. ProcessMaker is an open-source software, that is reliable ... Read More about ProcessMaker

Inngest is a developer platform for building event-driven, durable, and scheduled background functions without managing queues or workers. Developers write ordinary functions in their ... Read More about Inngest

Entry Level Pricing

  • Starts from $1,495
  • Starts from Free

Free Trial Availability

  • No free trial
  • No free trial

SpotScore

What's this? ↗

Not Available

9.6/10

User Ratings

Based on verified Spotsaas reviews

3.4

(15)
Get pricing help
Get pricing help

Where each option fits best

See where each product is strongest, which teams it fits, and what causes buyers to keep looking — before you commit.

Based on buyer reviews and verified product data collected by Spotsaas.

Strengths

Key strengths

Inngest

  • No Queue Infrastructure: Replace SQS + Lambda DLQ + exponential backoff implementation with a single Inngest function decorator — queue management becomes the platform's problem.
  • AI Workflows That Survive Failures: Multi-step LLM workflows with Inngest step durability survive server restarts, timeouts, and failures — each completed step is checkpointed.
  • Retry Logic Without Code: Automatic exponential backoff with configurable retry counts means transient API failures are handled by the platform, not by retry logic in every function.
Best fit

Best fit

Inngest

  • AI teams building reliable multi-step LLM workflows where individual steps can fail and need to resume without restarting the entire pipeline
  • SaaS teams replacing complex SQS + Lambda DLQ background job infrastructure with reliable Inngest functions
  • Serverless developers on Vercel or Cloudflare Workers who need durable background processing beyond the function timeout limit

Software Demo

Demo

Need a second opinion?

Get shortlist help from a software advisor

Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.

Spotsaas advisor
Get shortlist help from a software advisor
  • Independent advice — matched to your business
  • Understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors
  • Free 15-min call with a software advisor.

Step 1 of 4

How big is your team?

We tailor recommendations to companies your size.

Trusted by teams at

How do ProcessMaker and Inngest Compare on Features?

Total Features

4 Features

5 Features

Unique Features

No unique features

No unique features

Get Quote
Get Quote

Compare ProcessMaker and Inngest on pricing

Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.

Pricing Option

      Starting From

      • $1,495
      • Free

      Pricing Plans

      • Not Available
      • Free

        Free

        • 50k function runs/month

        • Community support

        • All features

      • Team

        $150

        paid

        • 1M function runs/month

        • Team features

        • Standard support

        Show more +

      • Enterprise

        Custom

        paid

        • Unlimited runs

        • SSO

        • SLA

        Show more +

      Pricing Page

      ProcessMaker pricing

      Pricing information not available

      Other Details

      Organization Types supported

      • Large Enterprises
      • Medium Business
      • Small Business
      • Individuals
      • Freelancers
      • Large Enterprises
      • Medium Business
      • Small Business
      • Individuals
      • Freelancers

      Platforms Supported

      • Browser Based (Cloud)
      • Browser Based (Cloud)
      • Mobile - Android
      • Browser Based (Cloud)
      • Browser Based (Cloud)
      • Mobile - Android

      Modes of support

      • 24/7 (Live rep)
      • Business Hours
      • Online
      • 24/7 (Live rep)
      • Business Hours
      • Online

      API Support

      • Available
      • Available
      Get help choosing
      Get help choosing

      Security & Compliance

      Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.

      SOC 2

      ✓ Yes

      HIPAA

      ✗ No

      Data Residency

      🌐 Global

      ProcessMaker User Reviews & Rating Comparison

      User Ratings

      4.8

      (based on 175 reviews)

      Rating Distribution

      15

      16

      0

      0

      0

      0

      0

      0

      0

      0

      Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI

      Buyer sentiment

      Buyer sentiment is mixed across 31 reviews, so it is worth reviewing the tradeoffs closely.

      What buyers like

      • Open-source flexibility
      • Customizable workflows
      • Reliable performance

      Common complaints

      • Requires technical knowledge
      • Support may be limited
      • Setup can be complex

      Buyer sentiment

      Buyer sentiment is very strong across 175 reviews, with consistently positive feedback.

      What buyers like

      • 4.8★ rating across developer reviews — consistently praised for dramatically reducing the complexity of building reliable background job infrastructure.
      • Step-level durability that survives server restarts and deployments eliminates the failed-mid-way background job problem that plagues serverless function implementations.
      • Works with existing code and deployment infrastructure (Vercel, Lambda) — no separate queue service (SQS, RabbitMQ) to provision, manage, or monitor.

      Common complaints

      • Managed infrastructure dependency means Inngest is on the critical path for all background job execution — outages affect all Inngest-dependent workflows.
      • Per-run pricing can become significant for very high-frequency background tasks — high-volume use cases need careful cost modeling before committing.

      Pros and Cons

      • Highly customizable to fit specific needs.

      • Open-source nature allows for flexibility.

      • Scalable for growing businesses.

      • Technical knowledge is essential for setup.

      • Support options may be limited.

      • 4.8★ rating across developer reviews — consistently praised for dramatically reducing the complexity of building reliable background job infrastructure.

      • Step-level durability that survives server restarts and deployments eliminates the failed-mid-way background job problem that plagues serverless function implementations.

      • Works with existing code and deployment infrastructure (Vercel, Lambda) — no separate queue service (SQS, RabbitMQ) to provision, manage, or monitor.

      • Managed infrastructure dependency means Inngest is on the critical path for all background job execution — outages affect all Inngest-dependent workflows.

      • Per-run pricing can become significant for very high-frequency background tasks — high-volume use cases need careful cost modeling before committing.

      Positive Reviews

      No reviews available for the product

      No reviews available for the product

      Used ProcessMaker or Inngest? Tell buyers what actually differs.

      Media and Screenshots

      Screenshots

      Creates SugarCRM entries from the Account module

      3 Screenshots

      No screenshots available.

      Videos

      video-0

      3 Videos

      No videos available.

      Top Alternatives to ProcessMaker and Inngest in 2026

      Alternatives

      No Alternative products available.

      Expand your shortlist

      Add another option to compare side by side

      Search by product name to compare pricing, fit, and buyer feedback in one view.

      Compare similar software options

      No Alternative Products ☹️

      Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].

      Frequently asked questions

      Which is better, ProcessMaker or Inngest?
      Inngest edges out the other on user ratings (4.8 vs 3.4). That said, the best pick depends on your use case — use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
      Do ProcessMaker and Inngest offer a free trial?
      Neither ProcessMaker nor Inngest currently lists a free trial.
      What is the starting price of ProcessMaker vs Inngest?
      ProcessMaker starts at $1,495 /Month. Inngest starts at Free free.
      What are the top alternatives to ProcessMaker?
      Top alternatives to ProcessMaker include Process Street, BP Logix BPMS, ProcessPlan, ProcessPolicy.com, Bonita.