Kenna Security vs Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management Comparison
Kenna Security
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
Kenna Security is enterprise-grade vulnerability management software that turns vulnerability scanning into a streamlined set of processes. Scan complex networks of all sizes across all levels of the internet using an in…
Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Free Trial
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management is an enterprise software solution enabling IT to monitor the organization's Windows (operating system and application) assets, detect and remediate threats, and deliver asset da…
Kenna Security leads on user satisfaction with a 4.3-star rating across 265 reviews.
SpotSaaS Analysis
Kenna SecurityMicrosoft Threat Vulnerability Management
The core difference between Kenna Security and Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management lies in Kenna's focus on enterprise-level vulnerability management with strong risk prioritization, while Microsoft offers a broader integration within its ecosystem, appealing to organizations already using Microsoft products. Kenna is ideal for medium to large enterprises seeking advanced risk management, whereas Microsoft is suited for businesses looking for a vulnerability management solution that integrates seamlessly with existing Microsoft tools.
- Best for enterprise vulnerability management - Strong risk prioritization features - Comprehensive visibility across large networks - User-friendly interface for varying expertise levels - Ideal for medium to large enterprises - Targets cybersecurity and IT services sectors
- Integrates well with Microsoft ecosystem - Suitable for organizations using Microsoft products - Focuses on a wide range of industries - Supports IT security managers and compliance analysts - Ideal for businesses with existing Microsoft infrastructure - Targets medium-sized enterprises and beyond
Kenna Security vs Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management — at a glance
| Feature | Kenna Security | Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | — |
| Reviews | 265 | — |
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Free version | No | No |
| Best for | Large Enterprises, Medium Business | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business |
| Category | Vulnerability Management Software | Vulnerability Management Software |
| Platforms | SaaS/Web/Cloud | SaaS/Web/Cloud |
| API | Available | Available |
| Support modes | Online | Online |
| Certifications | SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001 | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001 |
| Data residency | Global | US |
Key differences between Kenna Security and Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management
- Free trial: Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management offers a free trial; Kenna Security does not.
- Deployment: Kenna Security supports SaaS/Web/Cloud; Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management supports SaaS/Web/Cloud.
Kenna Security vs Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management — find the better fit before you commit.
Which tool fits your team best
Which is actually cheaper for your team size
Where each product wins, per real buyers
Most Vulnerability Management Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.
Biggest differences
Features
Pricing
Buying details
Security
Buyer feedback
Integrations
Product tour
Other options
Talk to an expert Talk to an expert | Talk to an expert Talk to an expert |
Biggest differences
Start here before you go deeper into features.
Best for enterprise vulnerability management with strong risk prioritization and integrations.
- You need comprehensive visibility and prioritization of vulnerabilities across complex, large networks.
- Your team values a user-friendly interface that supports varying expertise levels.
- You require automation of scans, notifications, and risk scoring to streamline workflows.
- You are a small business with limited budget constraints.
- You need highly customizable reporting and dashboards beyond the platform’s capabilities.
Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management
Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business
Kenna Security typically suits Large Enterprises and Medium Business. Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management tends to fit Large Enterprises and Medium Business better. The right choice depends on your team size, workflow, and whether a free trial matters.
Description | Kenna Security is enterprise-grade vulnerability management software that turns vulnerability scanning into a streamlined set of processes. Scan complex networks of all sizes across all ... Read More about Kenna Security | Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management is an enterprise software solution enabling IT to monitor the organization's Windows (operating system and application) assets, detect and ... Read More about Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management |
|---|---|---|
Free Trial Availability |
|
|
User RatingsBased on verified Spotsaas reviews | ||
Best Company Size | 100-5000 employeesMedium to large enterprises | 100 to 5,000 employees |
Get pricing help | Get pricing help |
Where each option fits best
See where each product is strongest, which teams it fits, and what causes buyers to keep looking — before you commit.
Based on buyer reviews and verified product data collected by Spotsaas.
Key strengths
- Proactive Risk Management: Kenna Security empowers your team to stay ahead of threats by prioritizing vulnerabilities based on real-world exploit data. This ensures that you’re addressing the most critical issues first, maximizing your security efforts effectively.
- Data-Driven Insights: With its advanced analytics capabilities, Kenna Security transforms complex security data into actionable insights. As a manager, you’ll appreciate how easily you can make informed decisions that align with your organization’s risk tolerance and business objectives.
- Streamlined Collaboration: The platform fosters seamless communication between security and IT teams. By breaking down silos, it enables everyone involved to work together more efficiently, ensuring everyone is on the same page when it comes to vulnerability management.
Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management
- Proactive Risk Reduction: Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management empowers your team to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities before they can be exploited, enabling us to take a proactive stance in our security posture.
- Streamlined Decision-Making: By providing actionable insights and contextual information about vulnerabilities, the solution helps managers make informed decisions quickly, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively where they’re needed most.
- Real-Time Visibility: With continuous monitoring and real-time alerts, executives can rest assured knowing they have a comprehensive view of their organization’s security landscape—enabling timely responses to emerging threats.
Best fit
- 100 to 5,000 employees.
- Cybersecurity, IT Services, Financial Services, Healthcare, Education, Government.
- Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs), Security Analysts, Risk Managers, IT Security Engineers, Compliance Officers.
Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management
- 100 to 5,000 employees
- Fintech, SaaS, Consulting, Healthcare, and Cybersecurity
- IT Security Managers, Risk Management Officers, Compliance Analysts, Security Analysts, and System Administrators
Reasons buyers look elsewhere
- Users may seek alternatives to Kenna Security if they require more customizable vulnerability management solutions that better align with their specific organizational needs and compliance requirements.
- Organizations with limited budgets might explore alternatives that offer similar functionalities at a lower cost, ensuring they can maintain effective security without overspending.
- Companies that prioritize integration with existing security tools may look for alternatives that provide smoother interoperability and enhanced collaboration with their current tech stack.
Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management
- Users may seek alternatives due to cost considerations, as some organizations find that competing solutions offer similar features at a lower price point, making budget management a priority.
- Integration challenges with existing systems can prompt users to explore other options that provide smoother interoperability with their current security infrastructure, enhancing overall efficiency.
- Organizations might require specialized features or capabilities that Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management lacks, leading them to evaluate alternatives that cater specifically to their unique security needs.
Software Demo
Demo |
|---|
Need a second opinion?
Get shortlist help from a software advisor
Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.
Compare Kenna Security and Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management on pricing
Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.
Pricing Option | ||
|---|---|---|
Pricing Plans |
|
|
Other Details
Organization Types supported |
|
|
|---|---|---|
Platforms Supported |
|
|
Modes of support |
|
|
API Support |
|
|
Get help choosing | Get help choosing |
Security & Compliance
Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.
SOC 2 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
|---|---|---|
HIPAA | — | ✓ Yes |
GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
ISO 27001 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Single Sign-On (SSO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Encryption | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audit Logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Residency | 🌐 Global | 🇺🇸 US |
Kenna Security User Reviews & Rating Comparison
User Ratings | No reviews available for the product | |
|---|---|---|
Rating Distribution | No reviews available for this product | |
Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI | Buyer sentiment Overall positive sentiment highlights ease of use and effective risk prioritization, tempered by concerns over pricing and support responsiveness. What buyers like
Common complaints
| What buyers like
Common complaints
|
Pros and Cons |
|
|
Positive Reviews | No reviews available for the product | No reviews available for the product |
List of Customers
Customers | No Customers information available. |  Telit  Skybox Security |
|---|
Media and Screenshots
Screenshots |  5 Screenshots |  4 Screenshots |
|---|---|---|
Videos |  3 Videos |  4 Videos |
Top Alternatives to Kenna Security and Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management in 2026
Alternatives |
|---|
Add another option to compare side by side
Search by product name to compare pricing, fit, and buyer feedback in one view.Compare similar software options
Related Blogs and Articles for Vulnerability Management Software
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, Kenna Security or Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management?
- Kenna Security edges out the other on user ratings (4.3 vs -1.0). That said, the best pick depends on your use case — use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
- Do Kenna Security and Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management offer a free trial?
- Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management offers a free trial. Kenna Security does not.
- What is the starting price of Kenna Security vs Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management?
- Kenna Security starts at Contact for pricing. Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management starts at Contact for pricing.
- What are the top alternatives to Kenna Security?
- Top alternatives to Kenna Security include Tenable.io, InsightVM, BeyondTrust Vulnerability Management, Qualys VM, Nessus.
- What are the top alternatives to Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management?
- Top alternatives to Microsoft Threat Vulnerability Management include Tenable.io, InsightVM, BeyondTrust Vulnerability Management, Qualys VM, Nessus.