FREE2026 Fleet Management Software Comparison|Independent, data-backed — no sales callGet the PDF →

Spotsaas logo
Free Excel template · Fleet Management

Fleet TCO Comparison Worksheet

A consultant-grade total cost of ownership model that compares up to three vehicle or fleet options on a like-for-like basis. Enter your annual cost lines once and the worksheet computes total cost of ownership, cost per mile, cost per year over the holding period, a keep-vs-replace breakeven, and a fuel-price sensitivity view with a recommended option.

  • Instructions
  • TCO Comparison
  • Per Mile & Per Year
  • Keep vs Replace
★★★★★Trusted by 3,000+ buyers· built from 140 fleet management software tools· independent
Excel template · FreeFleet TCO Comparison Worksheet

Where should we send it? Free · arrives in seconds · no spam.

We email it to you — one-click unsubscribe anytime.

  1. 1Tell us where to send it

    Your name and work email — nothing more.

  2. 2Check your inbox

    Your worksheet arrives in seconds, not days.

  3. 3Use it with your team

    Editable and ready to share — make it your own.

A peek inside

See exactly what you're getting

Free Excel template
Spotsaas · 2026
Fleet TCO Comparison Worksheet
Instructions
TCO Comparison
Per Mile & Per Year
Keep vs Replace
Get the worksheet

What it is

The Fleet TCO Comparison Worksheet is a total cost of ownership model that puts up to three vehicle or fleet options side by side on a like-for-like basis. You enter each annual cost line once — acquisition or lease, fuel, maintenance, insurance, licensing, downtime, driver allocation and resale credit — and the worksheet computes annual TCO, cost per mile, lifetime cost over the holding period, a keep-vs-replace breakeven and a fuel-price sensitivity view, then names a recommended option. It is the difference between buying on sticker price and buying on what a vehicle actually costs to run.

The model's organizing metric is cost per mile, which it treats as the single most important fleet number because it normalizes very different vehicles and utilization levels onto one comparable scale. A high-mileage truck and a low-mileage van can be judged fairly only once their cost is divided by the miles they actually do. The worksheet computes this automatically from your annual totals and expected mileage, and carries it through to the summary dashboard.

Two analyses sit alongside the core comparison: a keep-vs-replace mini-model that weighs the rising cost of an aging vehicle against the acquisition cost of a newer one, and a fuel-price sensitivity table that re-prices fuel at low, base and high scenarios so you can see whether your recommended option still wins when fuel moves. Both reflect the reality that fleet decisions are made under uncertainty.

What it's used for

Fleets use this worksheet to make acquisition and replacement decisions on economics rather than instinct, and to defend those decisions to finance with a transparent model. It is most useful at budget time, at lease renewal, and whenever someone proposes switching vehicle classes or fuel types.

  • Comparing up to three vehicle or fleet options on a true total-cost basis instead of sticker or lease price.
  • Computing cost per mile for each option so vehicles with very different utilization can be judged fairly.
  • Running a keep-vs-replace breakeven on an aging unit to decide whether the next year of running costs justifies replacement.
  • Stress-testing the recommendation against fuel-price swings with a low/base/high sensitivity table.
  • Building a fleet-renewal or fuel-switch business case that finance can audit line by line.
  • Evaluating buy-versus-lease and conventional-versus-EV options by forcing every cost into the same framework.
  • Setting a benchmark cost-per-mile target and identifying which options or units fall outside it.

Who uses it

The worksheet bridges operations and finance, so it is used by the people who run the vehicles and the people who pay for them. Its transparent formulas make it credible to a CFO and usable by a fleet manager.

Fleet Manager / DirectorOwns acquisition and replacement decisions and needs a defensible cost-per-mile comparison to choose between options.
Finance / Controller / CFOApproves capital and lease spend and wants to see total cost of ownership, not acquisition price, with auditable inputs.
Procurement / Sourcing LeadNegotiates vehicle and lease deals and uses the model to compare bids on true running cost rather than headline price.
Operations DirectorCares about cost per mile as the operating efficiency metric and uses the keep-vs-replace view to time renewals.
Owner-OperatorMakes high-stakes buy decisions with limited capital and needs to know which truck is genuinely cheaper to run over its holding period.

Context & good to know

Total cost of ownership is the discipline of counting every dollar a vehicle costs across its working life — not just the purchase or lease price, but fuel, maintenance, insurance, downtime, licensing and the resale value you eventually recover. The reason it matters is that acquisition price is often the smallest part of the picture: for a light-duty fleet vehicle, total cost per mile commonly runs in the rough range of $0.55–$0.75, and fuel and maintenance dwarf the monthly payment over a multi-year hold. Buying on sticker price alone routinely selects the more expensive vehicle.

Cost per mile is the metric this worksheet is built to surface because it is the great equalizer. Fleet software has converged on the same idea: Geotab and Samsara compute cost-per-mile and TCO views from telematics fuel and mileage data, and Fleetio rolls maintenance and operating cost per unit into the same picture. The spreadsheet gives a buyer the underlying model, which is useful both as a standalone tool and as a way to understand what those platforms are actually calculating.

The keep-vs-replace question is where TCO earns its keep. Every vehicle has an economic life, the point where rising maintenance and downtime overtake the cost of a newer unit's payment. Replace too early and you waste capital; too late and repair and reliability costs eat the saving. The worksheet's mini-model makes the breakeven explicit so the decision is timed on numbers rather than on which truck happens to be in the shop this week.

Fuel is the most volatile line in the whole model, which is why the sensitivity sheet exists. A recommendation that wins at today's fuel price may flip if fuel rises 20%, and a fleet committing to a multi-year hold needs to know that before it signs. Cross-checking the recommended option against the high-fuel scenario is a cheap insurance policy against a regret purchase.

✓ Independent · vendors can't pay to rank

Built on verified data, not vendor spin

Every Spotsaas resource draws on the Spotsaas Score — a blend of verified review ratings, review volume, and feature depth across 140 fleet management software tools. Refreshed regularly; data as of June 2026.

FAQ

Questions, answered

What is total cost of ownership for a fleet vehicle?

TCO is the sum of every cost a vehicle incurs over its working life: acquisition or lease, fuel, maintenance and repair, insurance, licensing and taxes, downtime, driver cost allocation, and the resale value you recover at disposal (entered as a credit). Comparing options on TCO rather than purchase price is the only way to see which is genuinely cheaper to operate.

Why is cost per mile the most important fleet metric?

Because it normalizes cost against utilization. A truck that runs 100,000 miles a year and a van that runs 20,000 can't be compared on annual cost alone, but dividing each one's total cost by its miles puts them on the same scale. Cost per mile is the number that tells you which vehicle, route or driver is actually efficient.

What is a typical cost per mile for a fleet vehicle?

For a light-duty fleet vehicle, all-in cost per mile commonly falls in the rough range of $0.55–$0.75, though it varies widely with vehicle class, fuel price, region and how downtime and driver cost are allocated. Heavy-duty trucks run higher. The worksheet computes your own figure from your inputs so you are comparing against your reality, not a generic benchmark.

How does the keep-vs-replace analysis work?

You enter the projected next-12-month cost of keeping your current vehicle versus the running cost of a newer replacement plus its acquisition cost. A positive 'annual saving from replacing' means the newer vehicle is cheaper over the next year and replacement is justified; a negative number means keeping the current vehicle is still the lower-cost choice.

Why does the worksheet include a fuel-price sensitivity view?

Fuel is the most volatile line in fleet cost, so a recommendation can flip when prices move. The sensitivity sheet re-prices each option's fuel at low, base and high multipliers and recomputes total cost, letting you confirm your chosen option still wins — or identify the fuel level at which a different option becomes cheaper.

Should I compare options with or without driver cost?

It depends on the question. Include allocated driver cost when comparing different duty cycles or staffing models, since labor often dwarfs every other line. Compare on non-driver lines only when the duty cycle is identical across options and you want to isolate the vehicle's own cost. The worksheet supports both by separating the driver line.

How do I enter resale value in the TCO model?

Enter the resale or residual credit as a negative number, because it offsets cost rather than adds to it. The worksheet then nets it against the other lines so your annual and lifetime TCO reflect the value you expect to recover at disposal.

Can I use this to compare leasing versus buying?

Yes. Force both options into the same framework: for the lease, the acquisition line is the annual lease payment and there is typically no resale credit; for the purchase, the acquisition line is the financed cost and you enter an expected resale credit. Comparing the resulting cost per mile and lifetime TCO is the cleanest way to settle buy-versus-lease.

Does this work for evaluating electric vehicles?

It does, because EV economics are exactly a TCO question — higher acquisition cost offset by lower fuel and maintenance. Enter electricity as the fuel line, lower maintenance, the relevant resale assumption and any incentives, then compare cost per mile against the conventional option. The fuel sensitivity sheet is especially useful here for testing energy-price assumptions.

How does TCO analysis connect to vehicle replacement planning?

TCO tells you which option is cheapest to acquire; replacement planning tells you when an existing unit has passed its economic life. They are two halves of the same lifecycle discipline — the keep-vs-replace sheet in this worksheet is the bridge, and a dedicated replacement planner extends it across the whole roster.

Grow your pipeline with buyers who are already looking for you

254,000+ buyers use Spotsaas every month to evaluate and shortlist software. Get in front of them — for free, or with a managed growth plan built around your category.