Plagramme Reviews in July 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons
Ensuring originality, preventing duplicity.
Add to compare
Plagramme offers custom pricing plan
Plagramme Reviews & Ratings
Spotsaas Editor’s POV
With a plethora of positive reviews highlighting its effectiveness, the plagiarism check program under review stands out as a valuable resource for maintaining academic integrity. Users commend its detailed analysis, swift identification of similarities, and user-friendly interface, making it a go-to tool for students, educators, and professionals. The program's ...Read more
Plagramme pros and cons
Effective in checking plagiarism to ensure academic integrity and originality.
User-friendly interface and accurate results make it essential for students, educators, and professionals.
Swift analysis identifies unintentional similarities, maintaining authenticity and credibility.
Promotes honest and original content, upholding academic and professional ethics.
Some users experienced issues with grammatical mistakes in text correction services.
Complaints about fake reports generated to prompt paid detailed reports.
Filter results
Sort by :
Showing 2571-2580 out of 3466
W
Whatever
11/29/17
Good job :) And now some more characters
Date of experience: November 30, 2017
WR
Wandy Rodriguez Gutierrez
11/29/17
Excelent app
Date of experience: November 30, 2017
RA
ReeMa Ali
11/29/17
good one for checking doc
Date of experience: November 30, 2017
TB
The BrightUrban
11/29/17
Nice and awesome tool to check the …
Nice and awesome tool to check the unique ness of your article
RR
Renno Revandika
11/29/17
Nice application
Date of experience: November 30, 2017
MH
Matheus Herculano
11/29/17
Very Useful
thanks for creating this app. This is very useful and simple, I would recommend it to all who wants to check their works.
JB
Jhedd Boldwin Yulangco
11/28/17
nice app very nice nice nice nice nice …
nice app very nice nice nice nice nice nice nice nice nice, amazing, extravegant
RM
Rasha Mohamed
11/28/17
Seliger (1972) found that readers often …
Seliger (1972) found that readers often separate the whole content into isolated pieces, and focus their attention on the individual word-units.The desire to know every word in terms of its dictionary meaning usually leads the students to view reading in the new language as a process of decoding word by word. Obviously, when reading in L1, the readers can more easily consider the content as a whole. Even if they encounter unfamiliar words, they skip to the next, and try to finish the ...
Read more
RE
Robertas Eismontas
11/28/17
5 stars!!!!!
Date of experience: November 29, 2017
RJ
Robson Jesus
11/28/17
Very best tool
Very best tool, melhor ferramenta para verificar plagio.
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].