spotsaas-logo
Get Listed
Plagramme - Plagiarism Checker Software

Plagramme Reviews in June 2025: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Ensuring originality, preventing duplicity.

4.7

Add to compare

Plagramme offers custom pricing plan

Request a Quote

Plagramme Reviews & Ratings

4.7

Excellent

Based on 6263 ratings & 3463 reviews

Rating Distribution

Excellent

(2839)

Very Good

(509)

Good

(82)

Poor

(14)

Terible

(19)

Expert's Review

With a plethora of positive reviews highlighting its effectiveness, the plagiarism check program under review stands out as a valuable resource for maintaining academic integrity. Users commend its detailed analysis, swift identification of similarities, and user-friendly interface, making it a go-to tool for students, educators, and professionals. The program's ...Read more

Plagramme pros and cons

  • Effective in checking plagiarism to ensure academic integrity and originality.

  • User-friendly interface and accurate results make it essential for students, educators, and professionals.

  • Swift analysis identifies unintentional similarities, maintaining authenticity and credibility.

  • Promotes honest and original content, upholding academic and professional ethics.

  • Some users experienced issues with grammatical mistakes in text correction services.

  • Complaints about fake reports generated to prompt paid detailed reports.

Log in Required to View Reviews

Filter results

Sort by :

Relevance
Relevance
Highest-Rated
Lowest-Rated
Least-Recent
Most-Recent

Share this page

Showing 2571-2580 out of 3463

WR

Wandy Rodriguez Gutierrez

11/29/17

5 out of 5

Excelent app

Date of experience: November 30, 2017

TB

The BrightUrban

11/29/17

5 out of 5

Nice and awesome tool to check the …

Nice and awesome tool to check the unique ness of your article

M

mn

11/29/17

4 out of 5

perfect for students

good site seems to work well

R

Robbin

11/28/17

5 out of 5

Great service

Great service. Could check my plagiarism perfectly.

RM

Rasha Mohamed

11/28/17

5 out of 5

Seliger (1972) found that readers often …

Seliger (1972) found that readers often separate the whole content into isolated pieces, and focus their attention on the individual word-units.The desire to know every word in terms of its dictionary meaning usually leads the students to view reading in the new language as a process of decoding word by word. Obviously, when reading in L1, the readers can more easily consider the content as a whole. Even if they encounter unfamiliar words, they skip to the next, and try to finish the ...

Read more

RE

Robertas Eismontas

11/28/17

5 out of 5

5 stars!!!!!

Date of experience: November 29, 2017

JB

Jhedd Boldwin Yulangco

11/28/17

5 out of 5

nice app very nice nice nice nice nice …

nice app very nice nice nice nice nice nice nice nice nice, amazing, extravegant

RJ

Robson Jesus

11/28/17

5 out of 5

Very best tool

Very best tool, melhor ferramenta para verificar plagio.

BC

Bethany C

11/28/17

5 out of 5

Excellent

Amazing work support tool! Very simple and accessible, also provides helpful and detailed reports!

RB

Rols Balbojs

11/28/17

5 out of 5

Recommended to every student

Lack of translations, but is very useful and helpful when writing!

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].