NEWJoin 1M+ SaaS Professionals|Get Weekly Insights, Trends & Expert PicksSubscribe Free →

Spotsaas logo

9.0

Spot Score

mabl - Automated Testing Software

mabl Reviews in June 2026: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Streamline your testing process with mabl's smart engine.

4.4

Add to compare

mabl offers custom pricing plan

Start Free Trial

mabl Reviews & Ratings

4.4

Very Good

Based on 19 ratings & 6 reviews

Rating Distribution

Excellent

(2)

Very Good

(4)

Good

(0)

Poor

(0)

Terible

(0)

Spotsaas Editor’s POV

mabl is designed for QA teams needing a lightweight solution for end-to-end testing across platforms. Its smart test engine simplifies the testing process, making it accessible for various users.Read more

mabl pros and cons

  • Cross-platform testing

  • Lightweight interface

  • Smart test engine

  • Simplifies functional testing

  • Limited advanced features

  • May require setup time

Filter results

Sort by :

Relevance
Relevance
Highest-Rated
Lowest-Rated
Least-Recent
Most-Recent

Share this page

Showing 1-6 out of 6

A

Anonymous

05/14/19

4 out of 5

Simple, yet powerful

What do you like best? Mabl has become the go-to for our e2e testing needs. Creation and maintenance of tests has become a breeze. Test failure investigation is quicker with detailed screenshots and HAR captures. What do you dislike? Mabl is not always able to handle certain trickier elements in the UI, which either require us to write custom JS steps or reach out to Mabl support. Also, run-time of the tests is significantly slower than our selenium-based tests. What problems are you ...

Read more

DM

Dhruv M

05/14/19

4 out of 5

Simple, yet powerful

What do you like best? Mabl has become the go-to for our e2e testing needs. Creation and maintenance of tests has become a breeze. Test failure investigation is quicker with detailed screenshots and HAR captures. What do you dislike? Mabl is not always able to handle certain trickier elements in the UI, which either require us to write custom JS steps or reach out to Mabl support. Also, run-time of the tests is significantly slower than our selenium-based tests. What problems are you ...

Read more

A

Anonymous

05/08/19

4 out of 5

Easy-to-use UI Automation tool

What do you like best? Ability to reuse sequences of test steps > "Flows" in mabl Javascript steps which can be used for API requests and custom assertions Output contains screenshots for relatively easy failure troubleshooting mabl team is responsive and helpful What do you dislike? Occasionally steps in trainer mode don't replay as smoothly as I would like. By this I mean, sometimes things fail in trainer mode which would pass in run mode. What problems are you solving ...

Read more

UI

User in Staffing and Recruiting

05/08/19

4 out of 5

Easy-to-use UI Automation tool

What do you like best? Ability to reuse sequences of test steps > "Flows" in mabl Javascript steps which can be used for API requests and custom assertions Output contains screenshots for relatively easy failure troubleshooting mabl team is responsive and helpful What do you dislike? Occasionally steps in trainer mode don't replay as smoothly as I would like. By this I mean, sometimes things fail in trainer mode which would pass in run mode. What problems are you solving ...

Read more

A

Anonymous

05/07/19

5 out of 5

MABL minimized

What do you like best? MABL was extremely easy to use and get up to speed on. By switching to MABL from open source JS libraries we have eliminated a huge barrier to entry into automation, increased productivity with non-SDETS contributing robust tests, and minimized maintenance with the ML used to identify objects and comparing to previous baselines. What do you dislike? MABL is young, and organization of journeys could be better but its not horrible. Recommendations to others ...

Read more

DP

Don P

05/07/19

5 out of 5

MABL minimized

What do you like best? MABL was extremely easy to use and get up to speed on. By switching to MABL from open source JS libraries we have eliminated a huge barrier to entry into automation, increased productivity with non-SDETS contributing robust tests, and minimized maintenance with the ML used to identify objects and comparing to previous baselines. What do you dislike? MABL is young, and organization of journeys could be better but its not horrible. Recommendations to others ...

Read more

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].

Grow your pipeline with buyers who are already looking for you

254,000+ buyers use Spotsaas every month to evaluate and shortlist software. Get in front of them — for free, or with a managed growth plan built around your category.