spotsaas-logo
Get Listed
Adobe Workfront - Project Management Software

Adobe Workfront Reviews in May 2025: User Ratings, Pros & Cons

Empower your workflow, unleash your potential.

4.2

Add to compare

Adobe Workfront offers custom pricing plan

Request a Quote

Adobe Workfront Reviews & Ratings

4.2

Very Good

Based on 1179 reviews

Rating Distribution

Excellent

(585)

Very Good

(409)

Good

(113)

Poor

(45)

Terible

(27)

Expert's Review

Adobe Workfront has consistently stood out as a robust and versatile project management solution, highly praised for its customizability and wide array of features. Its ability to adapt to the unique needs of organizations through flexible workflows, customizable dashboards, and metadata forms allows users to streamline task organization and project tracking ...Read more

Adobe Workfront pros and cons

  • Provides a highly customizable and flexible platform for adapting workflows to unique team or organizational requirements.

  • Excellent project planning and tracking tools with real-time updates enhance efficiency and streamline task assignments.

  • Intuitive user interface and cross-platform accessibility simplify work management and task collaboration.

  • Robust reporting and analytics enable effective progress tracking and issue identification in real time.

  • Steep learning curve due to the comprehensive set of features, making it overwhelming for some users.

  • Interface design and navigation can be complex, requiring extra time to locate updates or progress details.

Log in Required to View Reviews

Filter results

Sort by :

Relevance
Relevance
Highest-Rated
Lowest-Rated
Least-Recent
Most-Recent

Share this page

Showing 581-590 out of 1179

MK

Michael Keith

03/24/19

4 out of 5

Solid Platform and Great Support

Solid Platform and Great Support Workfront has most of the tools that we need and gives us the flexibility to make adjustments within our build as needed.

KN

Ken Netherland

03/19/19

2 out of 5

There have been 3 cases of questions…

There have been 3 cases of questions asked by me of the help desk where they have, in my opinion, simply forwarded me an article and left it up to me to figure it out. In all 3 cases, I did that first before I called in. I had to explain that it wasn't solving my problem and I already knew of the article. At one time, I had to insist on being handed over to Level 2 and guess what, Level 2 forwarded me an article.

KN

Ken Netherland

03/19/19

2 out of 5

There have been 3 cases of questions…

There have been 3 cases of questions asked by me of the help desk where they have, in my opinion, simply forwarded me an article and left it up to me to figure it out. In all 3 cases, I did that first before I called in. I had to explain that it wasn't solving my problem and I already knew of the article. At one time, I had to insist on being handed over to Level 2 and guess what, Level 2 forwarded me an article.

JC

Jennifer Ching

03/18/19

3 out of 5

Love Workfront for waterfall, proofing & Intake - Agile needs work

For the most part, Workfront is pretty easy to use. It works well for waterfall projects. Customization is highly flexible (almost TOO customizable)! The reason I gave it 3 stars vs higher marks is due to the limited agile functionality. We are having trouble adapting teams who are used to JIRA to now use Workfront. It's a constant challenge as JIRA users want some of the same function in WF and it's just not there yet. Overall though, Workfront has aided our move from a manual proofing ...

Read more

JC

Jennifer Ching

03/18/19

3 out of 5

Love Workfront for waterfall, proofing & Intake - Agile needs work

For the most part, Workfront is pretty easy to use. It works well for waterfall projects. Customization is highly flexible (almost TOO customizable)! The reason I gave it 3 stars vs higher marks is due to the limited agile functionality. We are having trouble adapting teams who are used to JIRA to now use Workfront. It's a constant challenge as JIRA users want some of the same function in WF and it's just not there yet. Overall though, Workfront has aided our move from a manual proofing ...

Read more

DT

Dina Theodoridou

03/11/19

4 out of 5

I have used WF since Dec 2017 and for…

I have used WF since Dec 2017 and for the most part it works well. It is good when it comes to creating timelines for individual projects but cannot support when building a campaign which includes up to 50 projects. Whereas Excel allows you to build one big campaign with smaller projects below it with key dates rather than detailed tasks, WF doesn't seem to accommodate this. This makes it very hard for the account teams when sharing with the client. WF is not the most visual tool so people ...

Read more

MH

Mark Hartfield

03/11/19

3 out of 5

UI is a struggle for new users

UI is a struggle for new users. The tool is designed for project managers, people who understand or who have had formal training in project management. The deal is, the majority of users aren't. They need a simplified version way to manage work, build out timelines, quickly update add remove tasks without have to thing about predecessors or task dependencies, etc.

MH

Mark Hartfield

03/11/19

3 out of 5

UI is a struggle for new users

UI is a struggle for new users. The tool is designed for project managers, people who understand or who have had formal training in project management. The deal is, the majority of users aren't. They need a simplified version way to manage work, build out timelines, quickly update add remove tasks without have to thing about predecessors or task dependencies, etc.

AU

Anonymous User

03/10/19

3 out of 5

"Sufficient"

What do you like best about Workfront? The proofing tool is great and it helps you stay organized. What do you dislike about Workfront?

AU

Anonymous User

03/10/19

3 out of 5

"Sufficient"

What do you like best about Workfront? The proofing tool is great and it helps you stay organized. What do you dislike about Workfront?

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].