PingAccess vs Symantec PAM Comparison
PingAccess
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
PingAccess is an innovative white label solution for Privileged Access Management (PAM). It allows organizations to manage privileged access to their computer systems in their own way. PingAccess allows companies using i…
Symantec PAM
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
Symantec Power Audit Manager (PAM) helps to verify privileged activity and user access. It employs risk scoring and dynamic monitoring to identify threats early. Powershell audit actionable intelligence help to protect t…
PingAccess leads on user satisfaction with a 4.8-star rating across 8 reviews.
SpotSaaS Analysis
PingAccessSymantec PAM
The core difference between PingAccess and Symantec PAM lies in PingAccess's focus on customizable privileged access management tailored for medium to large enterprises, while Symantec PAM lacks specific details on its target audience and features. Ideal buyers for PingAccess are medium to large enterprises seeking a flexible PAM solution with robust monitoring and reporting capabilities, whereas Symantec PAM may appeal to organizations looking for a more general PAM solution without specific customization needs.
- Best for medium to large enterprises - Offers customizable privileged access management - Ideal for organizations needing tailored solutions - Provides detailed monitoring, auditing, and reporting - Focuses on flexibility to meet specific policies - Suitable for teams requiring in-depth access management
- Lacks detailed information on target audience - No specific features or customization mentioned - General PAM solution without tailored options - May appeal to organizations with basic PAM needs - Pricing and company size details not provided - Limited insights into monitoring and reporting capabilities
PingAccess vs Symantec PAM — at a glance
| Feature | PingAccess | Symantec PAM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Reviews | 8 | 41 |
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Free version | No | No |
| Best for | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business | Large Enterprises, Medium Business |
| Category | Privileged Access Management (PAM) Software | Privileged Access Management (PAM) Software |
| Platforms | SaaS/Web/Cloud | SaaS/Web/Cloud |
| API | Available | Available |
| Support modes | Online | Online |
| Certifications | — | GDPR |
| Data residency | US | US |
Key differences between PingAccess and Symantec PAM
- User satisfaction: PingAccess scores higher with a 4.8-star average.
- Deployment: PingAccess supports SaaS/Web/Cloud; Symantec PAM supports SaaS/Web/Cloud.
PingAccess vs Symantec PAM — find the better fit before you commit.
Which tool fits your team best
Which is actually cheaper for your team size
Where each product wins, per real buyers
Most Privileged Access Management (PAM) Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.
Biggest differences
Features
Pricing
Buying details
Security
Buyer feedback
Integrations
Product tour
Other options
Talk to an expert Talk to an expert | Talk to an expert Talk to an expert |
Biggest differences
Start here before you go deeper into features.
Best for customizable privileged access management in medium to large enterprises.
- You need a flexible PAM solution tailored to specific organizational policies.
- Your team requires detailed monitoring, auditing, and reporting of privileged access.
- You prioritize strict enforcement of least privilege principles for security compliance.
- You are a small business with minimal privileged access needs and limited IT resources.
- You want an out-of-the-box PAM solution with straightforward setup and pricing transparency.
Large Enterprises, Medium Business
PingAccess typically suits Large Enterprises and Medium Business. Symantec PAM tends to fit Large Enterprises and Medium Business better. The right choice depends on your team size, workflow, and whether a free trial matters.
Description | PingAccess is an innovative white label solution for Privileged Access Management (PAM). It allows organizations to manage privileged access to their computer systems in their own way. ... Read More about PingAccess | Symantec Power Audit Manager (PAM) helps to verify privileged activity and user access. It employs risk scoring and dynamic monitoring to identify threats early. Powershell audit actionable ... Read More about Symantec PAM |
|---|---|---|
Free Trial Availability |
|
|
User RatingsBased on verified Spotsaas reviews | ||
Best Company Size | Medium BusinessLarge Enterprises | — |
Get pricing help | Get pricing help |
Software Demo
Demo |  PingAccess has not given any software demo yet If you're the owner of this profile, add your demo.Contact us |
|---|
Need a second opinion?
Get shortlist help from a software advisor
Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.
Compare PingAccess and Symantec PAM on pricing
Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.
Pricing Option | ||
|---|---|---|
Pricing Plans |
|
|
Other Details
Organization Types supported |
|
|
|---|---|---|
Platforms Supported |
|
|
Modes of support |
|
|
API Support |
|
|
Get help choosing | Get help choosing |
Security & Compliance
Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.
GDPR | — | ✓ Yes |
|---|---|---|
Single Sign-On (SSO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Encryption | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audit Logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Residency | 🇺🇸 US | 🇺🇸 US |
PingAccess User Reviews & Rating Comparison
User Ratings | 4.8 (based on 8 reviews) | 3.5 (based on 41 reviews) |
|---|---|---|
Rating Distribution | ||
Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI | Buyer sentiment Overall positive sentiment with high ratings but limited volume of reviews. What buyers like
Common complaints
| Buyer sentiment Buyer sentiment is mixed to positive across 41 reviews, with clear strengths and a few common watchouts. What buyers like
Common complaints
|
Pros and Cons |
|
|
Media and Screenshots
Videos | No videos available. |  3 Videos |
|---|
Top Alternatives to PingAccess and Symantec PAM in 2026
Alternatives |
|---|
Add another option to compare side by side
Search by product name to compare pricing, fit, and buyer feedback in one view.Compare similar software options
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, PingAccess or Symantec PAM?
- PingAccess edges out the other on user ratings (4.8 vs 3.5). That said, the best pick depends on your use case — use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
- Do PingAccess and Symantec PAM offer a free trial?
- Neither PingAccess nor Symantec PAM currently lists a free trial.
- What is the starting price of PingAccess vs Symantec PAM?
- PingAccess starts at Contact for pricing. Symantec PAM starts at Contact for pricing.
- What are the top alternatives to PingAccess?
- Top alternatives to PingAccess include PrivX, One Identity, ManageEngine PAM360, CyberArk PAS, ARCON PAM.
- What are the top alternatives to Symantec PAM?
- Top alternatives to Symantec PAM include PrivX, ManageEngine PAM360, CyberArk PAS, AWS Secrets Manager, Thycotic Secret Server.