CyberArk PAS vs PingAccess Comparison
CyberArk PAS
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
CyberArk's patented Privileged Access Management (PAM) software delivers privileged account security to help reduce risk, costs, and compliance exposure. Thousands of the world's leading organizations use the market-lead…
PingAccess
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
PingAccess is an innovative white label solution for Privileged Access Management (PAM). It allows organizations to manage privileged access to their computer systems in their own way. PingAccess allows companies using i…
PingAccess leads on user satisfaction with a 4.8-star rating across 8 reviews.
SpotSaaS Analysis
CyberArk PASPingAccess
The core difference between CyberArk PAS and PingAccess lies in CyberArk's focus on robust security for hybrid cloud environments, while PingAccess offers customizable solutions tailored to specific organizational needs. CyberArk is ideal for organizations prioritizing strong compliance and risk management, whereas PingAccess suits those seeking flexibility and detailed monitoring capabilities.
- Best for enterprise-grade privileged access security - Ideal for hybrid cloud environments - Suitable for medium to large businesses - Focus on compliance and risk reduction - Robust management across virtual and physical infrastructures - Strong security features
- Best for customizable privileged access management - Tailored solutions for specific organizational policies - Ideal for medium to large businesses - Emphasis on flexibility in PAM solutions - Detailed monitoring, auditing, and reporting capabilities - Supports diverse organizational requirements
CyberArk PAS vs PingAccess — at a glance
| Feature | CyberArk PAS | PingAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Reviews | 41 | 8 |
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Free version | No | No |
| Best for | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business |
| Category | Privileged Access Management (PAM) Software | Privileged Access Management (PAM) Software |
| Platforms | SaaS/Web/Cloud, Installed - Windows | SaaS/Web/Cloud |
| API | — | Available |
| Support modes | Online | Online |
| Certifications | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001 | — |
| Data residency | Global | US |
Key differences between CyberArk PAS and PingAccess
- User satisfaction: PingAccess scores higher with a 4.8-star average.
- Deployment: CyberArk PAS supports SaaS/Web/Cloud, Installed - Windows; PingAccess supports SaaS/Web/Cloud.
CyberArk PAS vs PingAccess — find the better fit before you commit.
Which tool fits your team best
Which is actually cheaper for your team size
Where each product wins, per real buyers
Most Privileged Access Management (PAM) Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.
Biggest differences
Features
Pricing
Buying details
Security
Buyer feedback
Integrations
Product tour
Other options
Talk to an expert Talk to an expert | Talk to an expert Talk to an expert |
Biggest differences
Start here before you go deeper into features.
Best for enterprise-grade privileged access security in hybrid cloud environments.
- You need robust privileged access management across both virtual and physical infrastructures.
- Your organization requires strong compliance and risk reduction capabilities in IT environments.
- You operate a medium to large enterprise with dedicated IT security and compliance teams.
- You are a small business with minimal privileged access needs and limited IT resources.
- You require a low-cost, easy-to-deploy PAM solution with transparent pricing.
Best for customizable privileged access management in medium to large enterprises.
- You need a flexible PAM solution tailored to specific organizational policies.
- Your team requires detailed monitoring, auditing, and reporting of privileged access.
- You prioritize strict enforcement of least privilege principles for security compliance.
- You are a small business with minimal privileged access needs and limited IT resources.
- You want an out-of-the-box PAM solution with straightforward setup and pricing transparency.
CyberArk PAS: Best for enterprise-grade privileged access security in hybrid cloud environments. PingAccess: Best for customizable privileged access management in medium to large enterprises.
Description | CyberArk's patented Privileged Access Management (PAM) software delivers privileged account security to help reduce risk, costs, and compliance exposure. Thousands of the world's leading ... Read More about CyberArk PAS | PingAccess is an innovative white label solution for Privileged Access Management (PAM). It allows organizations to manage privileged access to their computer systems in their own way. ... Read More about PingAccess |
|---|---|---|
Free Trial Availability |
|
|
User RatingsBased on verified Spotsaas reviews | ||
Best Company Size | Medium BusinessLarge Enterprises | Medium BusinessLarge Enterprises |
Get pricing help | Get pricing help |
Need a second opinion?
Get shortlist help from a software advisor
Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.
Compare CyberArk PAS and PingAccess on pricing
Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.
Pricing Option | ||
|---|---|---|
Pricing Plans |
|
|
Other Details
Organization Types supported |
|
|
|---|---|---|
Platforms Supported |
|
|
Modes of support |
|
|
API Support |
|
|
Get help choosing | Get help choosing |
Security & Compliance
Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.
SOC 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
|---|---|---|
HIPAA | ✓ Yes | — |
GDPR | ✓ Yes | — |
ISO 27001 | ✓ Yes | — |
Single Sign-On (SSO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Encryption | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audit Logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Data Residency | 🌐 Global | 🇺🇸 US |
CyberArk PAS User Reviews & Rating Comparison
User Ratings | 4.2 (based on 41 reviews) | 4.8 (based on 8 reviews) |
|---|---|---|
Rating Distribution | ||
Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI | Buyer sentiment Generally positive sentiment highlighting strong security features, with some concerns about pricing transparency and complexity. What buyers like
Common complaints
| Buyer sentiment Overall positive sentiment with high ratings but limited volume of reviews. What buyers like
Common complaints
|
Pros and Cons |
|
|
Top Alternatives to CyberArk PAS and PingAccess in 2026
Add another option to compare side by side
Search by product name to compare pricing, fit, and buyer feedback in one view.Compare similar software options
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, CyberArk PAS or PingAccess?
- PingAccess edges out the other on user ratings (4.8 vs 4.2). That said, the best pick depends on your use case — use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
- Do CyberArk PAS and PingAccess offer a free trial?
- Neither CyberArk PAS nor PingAccess currently lists a free trial.
- What is the starting price of CyberArk PAS vs PingAccess?
- CyberArk PAS starts at Contact for pricing. PingAccess starts at Contact for pricing.
- What are the top alternatives to CyberArk PAS?
- Top alternatives to CyberArk PAS include BeyondTrust Privileged Identity, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, BeyondTrust Password Safe, Xton Access Manager, ManageEngine Access Manager Plus.
- What are the top alternatives to PingAccess?
- Top alternatives to PingAccess include PrivX, One Identity, ManageEngine PAM360, CyberArk PAS, ARCON PAM.