AppVeyor vs Flosum vs Probo.CI Comparison
AppVeyor
Starting at $29
- Free Trial
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
AppVeyor allows user to set up a fully automated continuous integration/deployment process on Windows. It supports multiple configurations, allows user to build projects in Visual Studio or on the command line, run unit…
Flosum
Starting at Contact for pricing
- Large Enterprises
- Medium Business
Flosum is a new way to use continuous integration software that benefits both developers and QA teams. Developers can create as many automated test steps as they want, and with our unique build list they are guaranteed t…
Probo.CI
Starting at $30 /Month
- Freelancers / Consultants
- Large Enterprises
Probo.CI are used to build and test code in a number of environments automatically or on demand, when triggered by an event. The actual software can be training simulators, telecommunication systems – software that is pa…
Flosum leads on user satisfaction with a 4.8-star rating across 378 reviews.
AppVeyor vs Flosum vs Probo.CI — at a glance
| Feature | AppVeyor | Flosum | Probo.CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Reviews | 46 | 378 | 13 |
| Starting price | $29 | Contact for pricing | $30 /Month |
| Free trial | Yes | No | No |
| Free version | No | No | No |
| Best for | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business | Large Enterprises, Medium Business, Small Business | Freelancers / Consultants, Large Enterprises, Medium Business |
| Category | Continuous Integration Software | Continuous Integration Software | Continuous Integration Software |
| Platforms | SaaS/Web/Cloud | SaaS/Web/Cloud | SaaS/Web/Cloud |
| API | Available | — | — |
| Support modes | Online | Online | Online |
| Certifications | GDPR | SOC 2, GDPR | — |
| Data residency | US | US | Global |
Key differences between AppVeyor and Flosum
- Pricing: AppVeyor starts at $29. Flosum pricing is not publicly listed.
- Free trial: AppVeyor offers a free trial; Flosum does not.
- User satisfaction: Flosum scores higher with a 4.8-star average.
- Deployment: AppVeyor supports SaaS/Web/Cloud; Flosum supports SaaS/Web/Cloud.
Compare AppVeyor vs Flosum vs Probo.CI — and walk away knowing which one fits.
Which tool fits your team best
Which is actually cheaper for your team size
Where each product wins, per real buyers
Most Continuous Integration Software tools look identical on paper. This comparison cuts to the differences that matter — pricing structure, team fit, and what real buyers found after signing up.
Biggest differences
Features
Pricing
Buying details
Security
Buyer feedback
Integrations
Product tour
Other options
Free PDF comparison
Download this AppVeyor vs Flosum vs Probo.CI comparison
Get the full side-by-side as a PDF — these picks plus the top Continuous Integration Software tools, with verified ratings, pricing and features.
- Side-by-side on pricing, features & ratings
- Plus the category top 10, scored & ranked
- Emailed to you — no on-screen download
Biggest differences
Start here before you go deeper into features.
Best for streamlined Windows-based CI/CD with strong Visual Studio integration.
- You develop primarily on Windows and need seamless Visual Studio support.
- You want a hosted CI service that requires minimal infrastructure management.
- Your team values easy setup and clear documentation for quick pipeline configuration.
- You require cross-platform CI/CD support beyond Windows environments.
- You need high-speed concurrent builds on free or low-tier plans.
Best for Salesforce teams needing reliable, integrated continuous deployment.
- You require guaranteed execution of automated test steps every build.
- Your team needs seamless integration with Salesforce and tools like Jira.
- You want a flexible CI solution that supports both developers and QA.
- You are a small team or startup with limited budget for CI tools.
- You need a free trial to evaluate before committing to purchase.
Best for flexible, Jenkins-based CI in complex software projects.
- You need a highly configurable CI server leveraging Jenkins’ open-source model.
- Your projects involve complex environments like telecommunications or simulation software.
- Your team has CI/CD experience and can manage medium complexity setup.
- You require a turnkey, out-of-the-box CI solution with minimal setup.
- Your organization needs transparent, predictable pricing upfront.
AppVeyor: Best for streamlined Windows-based CI/CD with strong Visual Studio integration. Flosum: Best for Salesforce teams needing reliable, integrated continuous deployment.
Description | AppVeyor allows user to set up a fully automated continuous integration/deployment process on Windows. It supports multiple configurations, allows user to build projects in Visual Studio or ... Read More about AppVeyor | Flosum is a new way to use continuous integration software that benefits both developers and QA teams. Developers can create as many automated test steps as they want, and with our unique ... Read More about Flosum | Probo.CI are used to build and test code in a number of environments automatically or on demand, when triggered by an event. The actual software can be training simulators, ... Read More about Probo.CI |
|---|---|---|---|
Entry Level Pricing |
|
|
|
Free Trial Availability |
|
| |
Spotsaas ScoreWhat's this? ↗ | 8.8/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.6/10 |
User RatingsBased on verified Spotsaas reviews | |||
Best Company Size | Small BusinessMedium Business | Medium BusinessLarge Enterprises | Small BusinessLarge Enterprises |
Get pricing help | Get pricing help | Get pricing help |
Software Demo
Demo | Probo.CI has not given any software demo yet If you're the owner of this profile, add your demo.Contact us |
|---|
Need a second opinion?
Get shortlist help from a software advisor
Share your priorities, budget, and team needs, and we’ll help you narrow the options and understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors.

- Independent advice — matched to your business
- Understand the tradeoffs before you talk to vendors
- Free 15-min call with a software advisor.
Step 1 of 4
How big is your team?
We tailor recommendations to companies your size.
How do AppVeyor, Flosum and Probo.CI Compare on Features?
Total Features | 7 Features | 5 Features | 7 Features |
|---|---|---|---|
Unique Features | No unique features | No unique features | No unique features |
Get Quote | Get Quote | Get Quote |
Compare AppVeyor, Flosum and Probo.CI on pricing
Review starting price, plan structure, and free-trial access side by side so you can see which option fits your budget and buying process.
Pricing Option | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Starting From |
|
|
|
Pricing Plans |
|
| |
Pricing Page | ![]() | Pricing information not available | ![]() |
Other Details
Organization Types supported |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
Platforms Supported |
|
|
|
Modes of support |
|
|
|
API Support |
|
|
|
Get help choosing | Get help choosing | Get help choosing |
Security & Compliance
Certifications, data handling, and security controls for IT and compliance evaluators.
SOC 2 | — | ✓ Yes | — |
|---|---|---|---|
HIPAA | ✗ No | ✗ No | — |
GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | — |
Single Sign-On (SSO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | — |
Multi-Factor Auth (MFA) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | — |
Data Encryption | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | — |
Audit Logs | — | ✓ Yes | — |
Data Residency | 🇺🇸 US | 🇺🇸 US | 🌐 Global |
AppVeyor vs Flosum User Reviews & Rating Comparison
User Ratings | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Rating Distribution | |||
Spotsaas Editor’s POV generated by AI | Buyer sentiment Users appreciate AppVeyor's ease of setup and Windows integration but note limitations in speed and platform support. What buyers like
Common complaints
| Buyer sentiment Users generally express high satisfaction with Flosum’s efficiency, integration capabilities, and ease of use, despite some concerns about pricing and learning curve. What buyers like
Common complaints
| Buyer sentiment Overall positive sentiment highlighting flexibility and performance, tempered by concerns about pricing transparency and setup complexity. What buyers like
Common complaints
|
Pros and Cons |
|
|
|
Positive Reviews | No reviews available for the product | No reviews available for the product | No reviews available for the product |
List of Customers
Customers | ![]() ![]() Microsoft ![]() | ![]() Citrix ![]() Australia post ![]() CSA Group | No Customers information available. |
|---|
Media and Screenshots
Screenshots | ![]() 4 Screenshots | No screenshots available. | ![]() 4 Screenshots |
|---|---|---|---|
Videos | ![]() 2 Videos | ![]() 1 Videos | No videos available. |
Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
- Which is better, AppVeyor or Flosum?
- Flosum edges out the other on user ratings (4.8 vs 4.4). That said, the best pick depends on your use case — use the comparison tables above to evaluate each dimension.
- Do AppVeyor and Flosum offer a free trial?
- AppVeyor offers a free trial. Flosum does not.
- What is the starting price of AppVeyor vs Flosum?
- AppVeyor starts at $29. Flosum starts at Contact for pricing.
- What are the top alternatives to AppVeyor?
- Top alternatives to AppVeyor include Codeship, Semaphore, GitLab, CircleCI, Bamboo.
- What are the top alternatives to Flosum?
- Top alternatives to Flosum include Assembla, GitLive, Codeship, GitLab, CircleCI.



















